Why San Francisco mayor bans city employees from going to N.C.

San Francisco joins several corporations that seek to deprive North Carolina of revenue.

|
Emery Dalesio/Reuters
People protest outside the North Carolina Executive Mansion in Raleigh, N.C., Thursday. North Carolina legislators decided to rein in local governments by approving a bill Wednesday that prevents cities and counties from passing their own anti-discrimination rules. North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory later signed the legislation, which dealt a blow to the LGBT movement after success with protections in cities across the country.

In response to a new anti-LGBT legislation approved by North Carolina lawmakers, San Francisco Mayor, Ed Lee has banned city employees from traveling to North Carolina, unless it is necessary.

San Francisco’s move is the latest backlash against North Carolina’s legislation, joining several organizations and businesses that have also publicly expressed their dissent, aiming to deprive the state of revenue.

“We are standing united as San Franciscans to condemn North Carolina’s new discriminatory law that turns back the clock on protecting the rights of all Americans including lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals,” Mayor Lee said in the statement.

North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory signed the legislation into law Wednesday, voiding a Charlotte City ordinance that was set to take effect in April. The ordinance – passed by the Charlotte City Council in February – banned discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, and included a provision that allows transgender residents to choose restrooms corresponding to the gender which they identified with.

Advocates of the new law in North Carolina frame the law as a public safety issue, contending that such a measure could allow sexual predators to use women bathrooms and other spaces rendering them unsafe for residents.

“This action of allowing a person with male anatomy, for example, to use a female restroom or locker room will most likely cause immediate State legislative intervention which I would support as governor,” said Governor McCrory after Charlotte passed the ordinance last month, the AP reported.

Several corporations including  Apple, Google, Facebook, Salesforce, NBA and others criticized the state's measure. None of these companies said they would take any actions, but the NBA hinted that the measure may affect next year’s All-Star games that are set to take place in Charlotte.   

Some lawmakers opposing the law have already expressed their concerns.

“I have been on the phone all day today with several different business leaders,” Charlotte Mayor, Jennifer Roberts told the Charlotte Business Journal, reported the San Francisco Business Times. “They are greatly concerned for their employees, they’re anxious for their employees.”

Such measures are increasingly facing scrutiny from businesses and organizations. Last year, Indiana faced similar pressures after it passed a  religious freedom law, discriminating against LGBT, forcing lawmakers to amend the law. Georgia – which is considering a similar measure – is currently under scrutiny. Vox reported that Disney has said that it will stop filming in the state, if the governor signs the legislation into law.

“It’s hard to paint [North Carolina] as business-friendly when it’s taking steps that major businesses criticize,” writes David Graham, a staff writer at The Atlantic, contending that the state may be forced to revisit the measure, to prevent more backlash.

Some advocates of the new legislation are not concerned. Tami Fitzgerald, who is the North Carolina Values Coalition Executive Director said that the backlash is just a way of “ “shamefully bullying” state officials, contending that small business support the law, Columbia Daily Tribune reported.

“North Carolinians should be aware of this so they have the opportunities to be consumers of companies that are congruent with their values,” she said.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why San Francisco mayor bans city employees from going to N.C.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2016/0326/Why-San-Francisco-mayor-bans-city-employees-from-going-to-N.C
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe