Grand Canyon National Park: History of sexual assault?

After a decade of sexual assault cases among employees at the Grand Canyon, National Park Service leaders promise change and accountability. 

|
Brian Witte/AP/File
Officials at the Grand Canyon National Park, seen here in 2002, have outlined a series of changes after a federal report found employees at the Grand Canyon preyed on their female colleagues and retaliated against them for refusing sexual advances.

The National Park Service says it will address multiple reports of sexual harassment among employees at the Grand Canyon National Park. 

In 2014, 13 current and former Grand Canyon National Park employees filed a formal complaint, detailing 15 years of sexual abuse by their male colleagues. The accusations prompted an internal investigation by the US Department of the Interior’s Office of Inspector General. 

A federal report released last month confirmed the claims, describing "a long-term pattern of sexual harassment and hostile work environment" in the Grand Canyon river district, wherein women were subjected to sexual harassment by their male peers on agency-led rafting trips and then retaliated against after they refused the advances. 

"While dismayed at the work environment described in the report, I am committed to working to change the situation and keep similar situations from happening again,” Intermountain Region Director Sue Masica wrote in a memo this week.

She said employees will be disciplined appropriately and she will push a message of zero tolerance for sexual harassment and hostile work environments. “The employees of Grand Canyon National Park deserve nothing less,” she said.

In recent years, NPS managers have banned alcohol on all Grand Canyon trips, required trip supervisors and established an ombudsman outside of the NPS leadership to handle sexual assault complaints – the first measure of its kind in a national park. 

But one woman who worked as a ranger in the river district from 2009 to 2012 told The Associated Press that these efforts were “trivial” because the Park Service refused to acknowledge a pattern of sexual assault.

“It was a culture of victim-blaming perpetuated by all levels of management,” she says. “I repeatedly sat in meetings in which victims who had reported sexual violence were degraded and discredited.” 

Director Masica plans to change that. 

She says the Grand Canyon deputy superintendent and superintendent will be charged with ensuring adequate disciplinary action is taken, developing training programs for all employees, and separating patrol from support services for river trips within the year. Masica also plans to personally apologize to all of the victims. 

The Grand Canyon, like other national parks, faces other serious hurdles in the upcoming years.

For one, while the number of US park visitors has increased each year over the past decade, the number of employees has decreased in most parks. 

The National Park Service budget, slashed repeatedly over the past decade, dropped another five percent in 2015, resulting in cuts to both seasonal and regular employees. Last year, there was one park guide for each 100,000 visitors. 

Also in 2015, over 5.5 million people visited the Grand Canyon National Park – an all-time record.

In addition, both NPS staff and its visitors are aging. In the past decade, the number of visitors under the age of 15 has fallen by 50 percent, CNN reports. Three in four National Park Service employees are over 40 while only seven percent are younger than 29. Half of all park employees in leadership positions are scheduled to retire this year.

“If the park service doesn’t build a new constituency, our longer term future is at risk, to be blunt about it,” Jonathan Jarvis, NPS director, told the Salt Lake Tribune. “This particular industry also needs to build a new constituency.” 

NPS visitors and employees are also overwhelmingly white, with little minority representation.  

“The National Park Service gets far more ranger applicants than there are jobs available,” Jodie Riesenberger, program director for the National Parks Conservation Association, told CNN. “The issue is recruiting diverse applicants who represent America’s demographics. Additionally, our national parks are facing a budget crisis. Even if there are ranger openings, they don’t always have the resources to fill them.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Grand Canyon National Park: History of sexual assault?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2016/0218/Grand-Canyon-National-Park-History-of-sexual-assault
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe