Subscribe

Is Donald Trump's lead in the polls really all that surprising? (+video)

Donald Trump's rise in the polls has confounded many pundits and members of the media, but other suggest that that it shouldn't come as such a shock.

  • close
    Republican presidential hopeful Donald Trump speaks at his South Carolina campaign kickoff rally in Bluffton, on Tuesday.
    Stephen B. Morton/AP
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

Donald Trump's entry into the 2016 presidential race may have been heralded by the media and pundits as a distracting side show but, if early polling is any indication, he's gained a certain degree of traction among a not insignificant portion of voters.

A recent Washington Post poll conducted over the weekend showed that Mr. Trump’s the No. 1 choice of 24 percent of Republican and Republican-leaning Independent voters. Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker comes in a not so close second with 13 percent and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is third with 12 percent.

On some level, "The Donald" appeals to a contingent of voters who have otherwise felt that their opinions have not been heard, the Monitor's Mark Sappenfield reports

Trump matters because he is a voice for the disaffected conservative – mostly white, mostly over 65, mostly less-educated. This voting bloc might not be decisive, but it will be important, particularly in the Republican primaries. Even if Trump goes away, they won't.

The fact that Trump is appealing to a significant chunk of the Republican populace is indicative of a sweeping shift in the GOP that has largely been ignored by the media, Media Matters' Eric Boehlert writes.

Fueled by hateful rhetoric and right-wing media programming, Republicans and conservatives have veered towards extremism in recent years. If the press had honestly documented that trend, today's Trump phenomenon wouldn't come as such a shock.

Other pundits have countered that Trump's popularity is fueled by the media's fascination with him. Whether his recent success has been fueled by persistent media coverage, as George Washington University political scientist John Sides suggests in The Washington Post's "Monkey Cage" blog, or whether news outlets are just feeding an existing audience thirst, as Monitor's Peter Grier suggests, is a chicken-or-the-egg question that will likely persist throughout his campaign.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK