Idina Menzel: Are the best singers best for the national anthem?

Idina Menzel did a fine job with the 'Star-Spangled Banner' at the Super Bowl. But with such technically proficient singers like Menzel, the anthem lacks the drama – good and bad– that it has with singer-songwriters and pop stars. 

|
Michael Conroy/AP
Idina Menzel sings the national anthem before the NFL Super Bowl XLIX football game between the Seattle Seahawks and the New England Patriots Sunday, Feb. 1, 2015, in Glendale, Ariz.

Idina Menzel, once famous primarily among musical theater fans, capped off a year when she became a (sometimes mangled) household name in the most fitting way possible: singing the national anthem at the Super Bowl.

How did she do? Well, fine. The slow notes in the beginning were a bit shaky, but the high notes  from “the rocket's red glare” on were a breeze. That’s no surprise: Ms. Menzel has made a career out of belting notes that would fry the vocal chords of mere mortals.  She’s been doing it on Broadway for nearly two decades, most notably in “Rent.” And “Wicked.”

“Let it Go,” the mega-hit song from the mega-hit movie “Frozen” was this generation’s “My Heart Will Go On”: It made Menzel and her belt all but inescapable.

So yes, it makes sense that she would sing the anthem at the Super Bowl. And like opera star Renee Fleming last year, she is more than technically capable of handling such a difficult song.

But knowing your National Anthem singer can do the thing in her sleep is, frankly, a little boring. With its one and a half octave range, tricky jumps, and not-so-user-friendly lyrics, "The Star Spangled Banner" is vocal music’s ultimate spectator sport.  When pop stars and singer-songwriters tackle it, there’s drama in whether they’ll 1) hit the notes, 2) remember all the words, and 3) sing it straight or offer up a new interpretation.  At its best (Whitney Houston, Marvin Gaye), it can inspire happy tears. At its worst (Christina Aguilera forgetting the lyrics), disappointment and snickers.

With vocalists like Menzel, we know what we’re getting: a technically proficient but not particularly exciting, inspiring rendition. One particularly scathing review of Menzel’s anthem, from a Super Bowl watcher in Florida, called her “more interested in her ability to prolong the note than what the song represents.” It’s not that good singers can’t imbue the National Anthem meaning – Whitney Houston shattered any such notion long ago ­– but Menzel did it much better with “Let it Go,” and  “Defying Gravity” from Wicked. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Idina Menzel: Are the best singers best for the national anthem?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Sports/2015/0201/Idina-Menzel-Are-the-best-singers-best-for-the-national-anthem
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe