Chelsea Manning decision points to shift in views on transgender health care

Chelsea Manning, the transgender soldier connected with WikiLeaks, has been approved for hormonal and psychological treatments while in Army prison. It points to a shift toward some states and the federal government considering transition therapy medically necessary.

|
US Army/AP/File
US Army Pfc. Chelsea Manning poses for a photo. Defense Department officials say hormone treatment for gender reassignment has been approved for Chelsea Manning (formerly Bradley), a former intelligence analyst convicted of espionage for sending classified documents to the WikiLeaks website.

Army officials have approved hormone treatments for the male-to-female transition of Chelsea Manning, the transgender soldier convicted of espionage in 2013 after sending classified government documents to WikiLeaks, the Defense Department confirmed on Thursday.

Official approval to begin hormone treatments for Ms. Manning, formerly Pfc. Bradley Manning, who is currently in the Forth Leavenworth Army prison, marks a first for the Defense Department, which does not permit open transgender individuals to serve in the military, and had not previously provided transition-related health care in the past.

But the Army’s approval of Manning’s hormone therapy is part of a rapid and wide-ranging shift in how the nation sees transgender people and their health needs. Health providers and insurance companies across the nation, as well as the federal government and civil courts, have begun to reevaluate previous bans on sex-transition treatments, which have long been seen as elective procedures, like cosmetic surgery, that were done for personal, subjective reasons.

In past few years, however, the nation’s medical and psychological professions have increasingly shifted to considering transition therapy, in some cases including sex-reassignment surgery, medically necessary treatments of a condition referred to as gender identity disorder.

Though the idea of providing public funds for such treatments remains politically controversial, the nation’s health care structure has been changing.

In February, 2013, the Veterans Health Administration approved all “medically necessary care” for intersex and transgender veterans, including hormone therapy, mental health care, as well as pre-operative and post-operative care following sex-reassignment surgery. The VA does not provide such surgery, however.

Last year, the Obama administration ended the 33-year-old ban on Medicare coverage for both transition-related care and sex-reassignment surgery.

“We’ve had some really significant gains in the last few years,” says Dru Levasseur, director of the Transgender Rights Project for Lambda Legal, a New York-based lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender civil rights group. “And we see a growing number of states that are passing these private insurance bulletins that say that insurers cannot discriminate in the provision of health care for transgender people.”

In 2012, Oregon became the first state to tell private insurers to pay for transition procedures deemed medically necessary. Other states, including California, Colorado, Connecticut, Vermont, as well as the District of Columbia have done the same.

At the same time, much of corporate America has embraced more inclusive insurance coverage for transgender people – now included as a part of the Human Rights Campaign’s influential “corporate equality index” scores.

A third of Fortune 500 companies now cover transgender-related health care, including sex-reassignment surgeries, according to a Human Rights Campaign report released last fall. These include well-known companies such as Facebook, Starbucks, and Anheuser-Busch

Still, many object to the use of taxpayer funds, or even collective private insurance funds, to be used for what they say should be considered an elective procedure, like cosmetic surgery.  

"There are plenty of other ways to address this situation than to put taxpayers on the hook for it," said Pete Sepp, president of the National Taxpayers Union, about Manning’s hormone treatment, according to USA TODAY.

Advocates say the national movement is following the recommendations of the country’s top medical professionals and science-based research.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Chelsea Manning decision points to shift in views on transgender health care
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2015/0213/Chelsea-Manning-decision-points-to-shift-in-views-on-transgender-health-care
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe