- In surprise move, GOP leaders admit defeat in payroll tax battle
- More than 30,000 Germans turn out against anti-piracy treaty ACTA
- Does Obama blueprint reduce budget deficit fast enough? (+video)
- Pentagon budget: Does it pit active-duty forces against retirees? (+video)
- Deadlock on Syria: Likely crimes against humanity, but no plan of action
Cass Sunstein latest target for the anti-‘czar’ bunch
The same critics that successfully lobbied for the resignation of White House adviser Van Jones are now attacking Cass Sunstein, a prominent legal scholar and a professor at Harvard Law School. In January, the White House confirmed that Sunstein was in line to head the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, which oversees privacy, information, and regulatory policy.
Skip to next paragraphRecent posts
-
02.13.12
Could Mitt Romney lose to Rick Santorum in Michigan? (+video) -
02.13.12
Did Mitt Romney steal Maine caucuses from Ron Paul? -
02.11.12
Sarah Palin wows CPAC. But has the race for the White House moved beyond her? -
02.11.12
Political fallout from birth control fight: A glimmer of good news for Obama? -
02.10.12
Ron Paul's secret ninja strategy for Maine caucuses
At the time, Sunstein was lauded by many conservatives, including the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal.
But in recent weeks, the appointment has come under heavy fire. One of the most outspoken Sunstein opponents is Glenn Beck, who spearheaded the drive to oust Van Jones. Using his hit Fox News show as a platform, Beck has excoriated Sunstein for -- among other perceived sins -- leftist views on animal rights, hunting, gun control, and economic policy (video below).
As David Weigel of The Washington Independent notes, the push against Sunstein coincides with a general conservative attack on Obama's appointment of a number of 'czars' -- high-powered advisors directly appointed by the president. Here's an excerpt from a July 30 Washington Post column by Republican Eric Cantor, the house whip:
To be sure, the appointment of a few special officers to play a constructive role in a given administration is nothing new. What is new is the elevation of so many czars, with so much authority on endless policy fronts. Vesting such broad authority in the hands of people not subjected to Senate confirmation and congressional oversight poses a grave threat to our system of checks and balances.
According to Beck and others, Sunstein's appointment to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs qualifies him as a "czar," and thus as a target. A new website, stopsunstein.com, argues that "President Barack Obama has nominated Cass Sunstein, a radical anti-hunting, anti-gun, animal rights law professor to be his 'regulatory czar'." The site, which selectively pulls from past Sunstein statements without offering any context, encourages readers to petition their senators to block Sunstein's appointment.
But many have warned that conservatives are picking the wrong fight. Law professor and Instapundit blogger Glenn Reynolds, who identifies himself as a libertarian, says Sunstein should be approved.
“Do I think Sunstein will push a hunting ban? No. Do I think he’s sympathetic to hunting, particularly? No," Reynolds told The Washington Independent. "But what Obama appointee is likely to be? As the Van Jones affair indicates, there are a lot of people worthy of more concern than Sunstein. If I were advising Republicans, I’d tell them to focus their attentions elsewhere.”
—
Blago: Someone is lying, and it's totally not me
Beleaguered former Illinois governor and Elvis impersonator Rod Blagojevich has taken to the airwaves today to promote a new book called “The Governor,” which Blago says will prove his innocence. It’s going to have to one heck of a book.
–
Follow us on Twitter.








These comments are not screened before publication. Constructive debate about the above story is welcome, but personal attacks are not. Please do not post comments that are commercial in nature or that violate any copyright[s]. Comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence will be removed. If you find a comment offensive, you may flag it.