Daschle's exit a big deal? Talking heads disagree!
How big of a deal is Tom Daschle's decision to bow out as the nominee for the head of Health and Human Services? Depends who you ask.Skip to next paragraph
As Iowa's Kent Sorenson jumps to Ron Paul ship, rat analogies abound
Could Romney 'train' be derailed by Gingrich? Perry? Someone new?
Virginia primary: Was it so hard for Perry and Gingrich to get on the ballot?
Donald Trump as third-party candidate: Will he woo Americans Elect?
Ron Paul: why racist newsletter flap could hurt him in Iowa
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
So it seems like it might depend on when to ask as well.
Regardless, with Daschle's departure, along with Nancy Killefer's withdrawal for tax reasons too (she was to be the nation's first chief performance officer), the talking heads were buzzing Tuesday night over the implications.
Hair on fire
MSNBC's Rachel Maddow thinks it's no big deal. She pooh-poohed the issue, asking, "Why is everyone's hair on fire about Tom Daschle?"
"So Tom Daschle had to withdraw as a nominee as well as that other person who was going to be in that job that doesn't exist now," she said referencing Killefer.
"This is obviously the end of the world!" Maddow said, feigning outrage.
Remember those people?
"If you said vaguely, then congratulations," she offered. "You have just put today's Tom Daschle news in perspective."
If you don't recall them, they were unsuccessful nominees for Attorney General under President Bill Clinton.
Au contraire, says FOX's Sean Hannity (but in English). In a segment titled, "Ethical Shortcomings," Hannity lambasted President Obama, citing yesterday's twin departures and the tax problems of Treasury Secretary Geitner.
"Perhaps the worst part of this whole sordid affair is the president's empty promise of a higher standard of ethics," he said. "He promised to keep lobbyists out of the White House and then he hired them anyway."