Subscribe

Jindal and Rubio: why being young isn't necessarily a reason to wait

Gov. Bobby Jindal and Sen. Marco Rubio might have given a presidential run a pass. But political opportunities like the one for GOP candidates in 2016 are fleeting. 

  • close
    Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal waves to supporters after announcing his candidacy for president in Kenner, La., on June 24, 2015. He's the youngest GOP candidate in the race, just behind Sen. Marco Rubio (R) of Florida.
    Gerald Herbert/AP
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal has become the 13th major Republican candidate for president. Born on June 10, 1971, he is the youngest of the lot. The second-youngest is Senator Marco Rubio (R) of Florida, just two weeks older. 

Their decisions to run might seem puzzling. Governor Jindal has little support. A recent poll found that he was the choice of just one likely Republican primary voter out of 236 respondents – not 1 percent, but one person. Senator Rubio is doing much better in surveys, but he has a daunting task: In his home state of Florida, former Gov. Jeb Bush has already locked up a great deal of organizational and financial support.  

Moreover, if they stay in the presidential race and lose, they will be out of office. Jindal faces a gubernatorial term limit this year, and running for president means not running for the Senate. Rubio, likewise, is passing up a Senate reelection campaign. So wouldn’t it make more sense for them to forgo a 2016 presidential bid? After all, even if they were to wait until the year 2036, they would still be younger than Hillary Clinton is today.

Recommended: 14 Republicans running in 2016

Part of the answer is the general election’s setting. After a party has been in the White House for two terms, many voters start to think that it is time for a change. All other things being equal, these circumstances give an edge to the out-party. Of course, other things are not always equal, since good economic news and foreign policy triumphs can shift the advantage back to the in-party. In 1988, the economy was strong and President Reagan’s visit to Red Square dramatized the easing of cold war tensions. Accordingly, Vice President George H.W. Bush scored a third consecutive GOP victory. As we approach 2016, however, the economy does not look quite that robust, and the international scene seems dicey.

So to any Republican who wants to be president, 2016 appears to offer a pretty good chance. That’s why 11 other GOP candidates have gotten in the race.

There is also a cost to waiting for another turn. Suppose that Jindal and Rubio were to sit out 2016 and that another Republican won the election. Presumably, winner would seek reelection in 2020, meaning that Jindal and Rubio would not have another shot until 2024. At that point, the GOP would face the potential third-term disadvantage that Democrats are confronting today. Perhaps conditions would become more auspicious four or eight years after that, but it is impossible to forecast political trends that far ahead.

One thing is absolutely certain, however: In future presidential elections, Jindal and Rubio will be older than they are today. That self-evident truth may sound trivial, but it probably drives their determination to run this time. Their relative youth is at the core of their appeal. They can both claim to be representatives of a new generation, and they can talk up their youthful vigor, like JFK in 1960 and Bill Clinton in 1992. 

The 2016 election may not be their last chance to run for president, but it will be their last chance to run in their mid-40s. If they were to wait until their 50s, they would be fighting with younger, hungrier rivals.

In politics as in baseball, it gets late early out there.

Jack Pitney writes his Looking for Trouble blog exclusively for the Monitor.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK