Subscribe

Romney, really? Backlash begins for 2016 bid. (+video)

Many GOP leaders are less than thrilled by Mitt Romney's decision to run for president for a third time.

  • close
    Republican presidential canadiate Mitt Romney smiles on the field before an NFL football game between the New York Jets and the Miami Dolphins in East Rutherford, N.J., Dec. 1, 2014.
    Julio Cortez/AP
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

In recent days Republican Party donors, strategists, state chairman, and so forth have awoken to the fact that Mitt Romney is really very serious about running for president again. Many are surprised – they believed his long-standing demurrals of interest.

Party actors generally spoke well of Mr. Romney when it seemed he would settle into the status of a party elder. Now that he’s sprung back on stage many are grumbling that a Romney revival may not be a good idea.

“If Mitt Romney is the answer, what is the question?” said the reliably conservative Wall Street Journal editorial page Wednesday.

Recommended: 14 Republicans running in 2016

The grumbling appears to come from at least two sources of opposition within the party.

One faction is composed of big donors and others who have already begun to coalesce about former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush as a possible choice for the party establishment. Some of these party insides backed Romney in the past but grew weary at his inability to connect with voters and now see Mr. Bush as a fresher face with better communication skills.

A New York Times story Wednesday on the Romney reaction notably included remarks from two GOP money men who called a reporter back to clarify that they have Bush ties and aren’t returning to the Romney camp for 2016.

A second group is comprised of conservatives who continue to distrust Romney’s right-leaning bona fides. And by “conservatives," we mean establishment and congressional figures as well as the tea party-oriented right wing.

As in 2012, these folks suspect Romney remains a closet moderate. In particular, they object to comments from Romney supporters that he’ll run to Bush’s right. They grumble that ideological position isn’t a choice the candidate makes, like a choice of clothing. It’s a result of past positions taken by a politician who, yes, in the past effectively supported abortion rights and signed an Obamacare-like health bill into law in Massachusetts.

“Romney’s assessment of the GOP nomination marketplace has revealed that there is a demand for an establishment candidate to the right of Bush, so he thinks he can manufacture a product with Romney 3.0 that will meet that market demand. Never mind Romney’s actual record or convictions,” writes right-leaning Philip Klein at the Washington Examiner.

All this represents more than just free-range criticism. As we’ve written, the 2016 presidential race is in the crucial invisible primary stage where hopefuls vie for the support of important party figures. The griping signals that Romney may face a more difficult environment in 2016 than he hoped.

Some of the faithful are returning to his side. In New Hampshire, State Senate majority leader Jeb Bradley and 2012 top advisers Thomas Rath and Jim Merrill have said they will again support Romney, according to NBC News.

But many of Romney’s former GOP allies in Washington aren’t racing to sign up for a repeat performance. Sen. John McCain of Arizona spoke warmly of Romney this week but avoided the question of whether he’d again support the party’s 2012 nominee. Sens. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Susan Collins of Maine have basically taken the same position.

“Complicating Romney’s bid for support this time around: a deep field of primary alternatives and a reluctance – even among former supporters – to give another try to a candidate who lost the last time around,” writes National Journal’s Lauren Fox.

[Editor's Note: The original summary misidentified the number of times Romney ran for president.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK