Bin Laden 'demon toy' and three other wacky CIA plots

Before the CIA reportedly produced an Osama bin Laden action figure whose face peeled off to reveal a scary devil, an attempt to frighten children, it was involved in other unusual projects.

|
Akram Shahid/Reuters/File
A shop assistant shows an Osama bin Laden figurine being taken away in a toy US military vehicle, in Hyderabad, 100 miles from Karachi, Pakistan, March 2003.

The Central Intelligence Agency secretly developed an Osama bin Laden action figure whose face peeled off to reveal a scary devil beneath, according to an account first published this week in The Washington Post.

The 2005 effort was meant to produce a toy that could be distributed in Afghanistan. The point was to frighten children and their parents and lower their esteem for the then-hidden Al Qaeda leader, said the Post.

The project was code-named “Devil Eyes” and progressed to at least the prototype stage. Some sources said a substantial number of the figures – whose face reportedly changed when exposed to heat – were actually produced at a factory in China.

Does that sound like an off-beat approach to psychological warfare operations? Sure, but it also sounds like the CIA. In the past the agency has occasionally hatched humorous, bizarre, or downright wacky plans to fulfill a variety of missions. In the 1960s and ‘70s the orders for these things often came directly from the CIA’s cadre of top career officials.

“These were men who seem to have pictured themselves as figures out of a Fitzgerald novel. As was true of so many Fitzgerald characters, there was a great deal of immaturity in them: a great deal of the undergraduate fraternity house,” wrote lawyer and historian David Fromkin in a 1996 Foreign Affairs article on the CIA’s social history.

Such attitudes persisted in some parts of the agency at least through the late stages of the Cold War. We remember one agency clandestine agent trainee repeating a story an instructor had recounted, which involved the CIA placing an ad in a Central American newspaper purporting to be from the local Soviet legation. The embassy was paying for dead cats, according to the ad.

Locals showed up with the said cats to collect their money, but were turned away by the Soviets. Angry, they began pitching dead cats over the USSR embassy walls.

This spy vs. spy story may be apocryphal. But here are three CIA projects for which documentary evidence exists:

Blue movies

In the 1950s, the CIA produced a pornographic film starring an actor made up to resemble Indonesian President Sukarno. The idea was to discredit Sukarno in the eyes of his countrymen, according to the 1976 memoir of a CIA officer, Joseph Burkholder Smith, as the Indonesian leader was viewed as insufficiently pro-West at the time.

The film, titled “Happy Days” was made, and still photos of the action where produced for distribution in the region, but it’s unclear whether they were ever actually handed out.

According to a 2010 Washington Post story, the CIA considered doing something similar with a Saddam Hussein lookalike during the run-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, but that plan never got past the talking stage.

Acoustic kitty

The CIA implanted a listening device and transmitter in a cat in an attempt to eavesdrop on suspected Soviet agents, according to a 1967 agency report on the effort posted by the National Security Archive.

Having successfully created a four-footed, living bug, the agency set out to test their cat in a Washington park. They set it down and tried to direct it toward a park bench where two men were engaged in conversation, but sadly, the cat was run over by a taxi before it could get there, according to Victor Marchetti, a former special assistant to the CIA Director.

One thing agency technicians discovered during this project was that cats have a mind of their own and are difficult to place near secret conversations. The 1967 report concluded that pursuing the approach “would not be practical.”

The exploding seashell

Probably the most famous of all CIA plots was not one scheme, but many: Operation Mongoose, the covert operation against Cuban President Fidel Castro.

Hatched by the Kennedy administration in the wake of the Bay of Pigs embarrassment, Operation Mongoose, also known generally as the “Cuban Project,” considered placing a bomb inside a sea shell in an area where Castro was known to enjoy scuba diving. This was dropped after an internal agency debate on such questions as whether it was possible to ensure Castro would be the person to pick the shell up, according to journalist Thomas Powers’ classic book on former CIA chief Richard Helms, “Helms and the Agency: The Man Who Kept the Secrets.”

Then agency technicians hit on the idea of giving Castro a gift: a poisoned wet suit. They went so far as to produce a suit contaminated with fungal spores meant to cause a chronic skin disease. But this plan also foundered on practical concerns, and eventually the suit was destroyed, according to Powers.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Bin Laden 'demon toy' and three other wacky CIA plots
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Decoder/2014/0620/Bin-Laden-demon-toy-and-three-other-wacky-CIA-plots
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe