Obama vs. Romney 101: 4 ways they differ on China

China's rise has led President Obama to “pivot” his foreign policy toward Asia, hoping to enhance US power and expand its cooperation with China. Romney speaks more in terms of confronting a country whose interests often clash with those of the US. 

4. Human rights

J. Scott Applewhite/AP/File
Chinese dissident Chen Guangcheng (c.) speaks at an event on Capitol Hill in Washington on Aug. 1, 2012.

When Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton negotiated dissident Chen Guangcheng’s departure for study in the US in May, she did it not only while in China but from the midst of an intense, multiday strategic dialogue with senior Chinese officials.

The result reflected the quintessential feature of Obama’s approach to China and human rights – a balance that seeks to press China to improve its human-rights record without embarrassing it or making Chinese leaders feel as if they are being pushed up against a wall, something Obama believes would be counterproductive.

Romney says he would take a tougher stance toward China on human rights, although some analysts point out that candidate George W. Bush promised a tougher line on China than he generally took as president.

In his China and East Asia position paper, Romney puts in stark terms the confrontational approach he would take with China over human rights. Stating that the “Chinese regime continues to deny its people basic political freedoms and human rights,” he adds that “a nation that represses its own people cannot be a trusted partner in an international system based on economic and political freedom.”

For Romney, the US has “an important role to play” in encouraging China’s evolution toward a more democratic political system, primarily by providing “vigorous support” for civil-society organizations advocating political reform, women’s rights, and religious freedom.

Seeking to differentiate his approach from what he says has been Obama’s policy of relegating freedom to “second or third place,” Romney picks up a line from a foreign-policy speech he gave last year and says, “If the United States fails to support dissidents out of fear of offending the Chinese government, we will merely embolden China’s leaders.”

For a full list of stories about how Romney and Obama differ on the issues, click here.

4 of 4

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.