How Hillary snagged the largest LGBT endorsement

The Human Rights Campaign endorsed Hillary Clinton for president Tuesday, favoring Clinton's potential over Sanders' voting history. 

|
Brian C. Frank/Reuters
U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton gives a speech at a rally in Toledo, Iowa January 18, 2016.

The Human Rights Campaign (HRC), the largest LGBT organization in the country, endorsed Hillary Clinton for president Tuesday. 

“All the progress we have made as a nation on LGBT equality – and all the progress we have yet to make – is at stake in November,” HRC President Chad Griffin said in a press release Tuesday. “We are proud to endorse Hillary Clinton for president, and believe that she is the champion we can count on in November – and every day she occupies the Oval Office.”

The 32-member board of HRC endorsed Clinton by a unanimous vote this weekend. 

“The board felt that Hillary Clinton has laid out the most robust plan in the campaign on LGBT issues,” HRC spokesman Brandon Lorenz told The Christian Science Monitor in a phone interview Tuesday. “They thought she was best equipped to fight for us and our issues and do so during the general election.” 

Mr. Lorenz tells the Monitor that the board used three pillars of endorsement criteria: “support for issues of concern to the community, demonstrated leadership on LGBT issues and viability” in the 2016 election. 

Clinton faced a tough competitor for the endorsement. Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders was one of the country’s first political supporters of LGBT rights, officiating a Gay Pride Day as Mayor of Burlington in 1983. In 1996, Sanders was one of only 67 members in the House of Representatives who opposed the Defense of Marriage Act, a law that barred all federal recognition of same-sex marriage. HRC even awarded Sanders a perfect score – 100 percent – on its Congressional Equality Index.

But for Clinton, a history of support is not necessarily a prerequisite for future leadership. 

“You know, somebody is always first,” Clinton tells NPR’s Terry Gross in a 2014 interview regarding her political evolution on gay rights. “But that doesn’t mean that those who joined later in being publicly supportive or even privately accepting that there needs to be change are any less committed. You could not be having the sweep of marriage equality across our country if nobody changed their mind. And thank goodness so many of us have.” 

And LGBT leaders tend to agree: first doesn’t mean best.

“Secretary Clinton has made LGBT equality a pillar of her campaign and recently unveiled the most robust and ambitious LGBT plan any candidate for president has ever laid out,” HRC writes in their press release.

Both Sanders and Clinton list LGBT equality goals as part of their campaign platforms, such as signing the Equality Act, which would add LGBT protection federal civil rights law, ensuring better police education on LGBT issues.

But it is in her almost 3,000-word briefing that Clinton outshines Sanders in the eyes of many LGBT rights activists, announcing detailed policy initiatives such as dropping the ban on open transgender military service, correcting the records of military members who were wrongfully discharged under the "Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell" policy, ending LGBT conversion therapy for minors and securing affordable treatment for people with HIV and AIDS. 

“[Clinton] has a long record of being a strong advocate for LGBT rights and for being a leader in the debate – especially when she was in Congress and as Secretary of State,” Richard Socarides, a Democratic political commentator and former aide to President Bill Clinton, told The Christian Science Monitor in a phone interview Tuesday. “Bernie Sanders, while he may have voted correctly, he has not been a leader, he has not been at the center of any of these debates.” 

But Clinton’s history on LGBT rights has not been completely ignored. 

On MSNBC's "The Rachel Maddow Show" in October, Clinton tried to defend her husband’s signing of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, on the grounds that it successfully prevented an equivalent Constitutional amendment. 

But those who were there at the time saw no signs of a more restrictive law in the works. “It’s ridiculous. There was no threat in the immediate vicinity of 1996 of a constitutional amendment. It came four years later,” Elizabeth Burch, executive director of HRC from 1995 to 2004, told the Huffington Post in response to Clinton’s comments. It may be that she needs to revisit the facts of what happened.” 

Clinton also has other ties to HRC leadership. HRC President Griffin, who began his career in the White House Press Office under President Bill Clinton, has voiced his personal support for Hillary. Some of HRC’s top corporate partners include CitiBank, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley – all three of which are also present on Clinton’s Top Ten Donor list

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to How Hillary snagged the largest LGBT endorsement
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2016/0119/How-Hillary-snagged-the-largest-LGBT-endorsement
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe