Skip to footer

11 states charging hard against abortion

Numerous governors are promoting new limits on abortion – or have already signed legislation. Here’s a rundown:

5. North Carolina: Federal judge overturns ultrasound law

[Updated Jan. 21, 2014] On Jan. 17, a federal judge overturned a state law requiring women wanting an abortion to have an ultrasound and hear a description of the image from a health-care provider. US District Judge Catherine Eagles said the law, which passed in 2011, was a violation of constitutional free-speech rights.

On July 29, 2013, Governor McCrory (R) signed legislation adding new requirements for abortion clinics and doctors.

Clinics would have to upgrade to become like ambulatory surgical centers, and establish transfer agreements with hospitals. Physicians would have to be present for the duration of an abortion, whether surgical or chemical. Sex-selection abortions would be banned.

The bill also excludes abortion coverage in health plans that will be offered on the state’s online health-insurance exchange. Health plans offered to city and county workers would be subject to the same ban. And state funds would not eligible for use with abortions except in cases of rape or incest or to save the life of the woman.

Supporters of the law say it will protect women. Opponents say it could restrict access to abortion. Only one of North Carolina’s 16 abortion clinics meets the new facilities standards.

During his campaign, Governor McCrory promised not to reduce access to abortion, and he maintains the new law upholds that pledge. Language in the law gives the state health department leeway in the drafting of new regulations, and some abortion-rights supporters are hopeful the state health secretary will limit the impact of the law.

5 of 11
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.