What if US rockers were convicted of ‘hooliganism’ like Russia’s Pussy Riot?

Bands from 'Rage Against the Machine' to the 'Dixie Chicks' have harshly criticized political leaders in the US. Like Russia's 'Pussy Riot,' shouldn't they be charged with hooliganism?

|
Bob Wellinski/LaPorte Herald Argus/AP
Ted Nugent (center) with band members Derek St Holmes (left) and Greg Smith (right) perform before a large crowd at the LaPorte County fair Saturday July 14 in LaPorte, IN.

The two-year prison sentence for the women of “Pussy Riot” has us musing about the political shenanigans of American performers.

Pussy Riot, you’ll recall, is the Russian band convicted of “felony hooliganism” for criticizing President Vladimir Putin in its performance of a “punk prayer” in the Christ the Savior Cathedral in Moscow in February. The episode – the women wore bright dresses and balaclavas as they lip-synched “Mother of God, cast Putin out” – lasted less than a minute before security hustled them away.

Would such a thing in the United States be considered “hooliganism” (a wonderful word bringing to mind European soccer fans and some congressional hearings)? If so, should that be a punishable offense in this country, and what would be an appropriate legal response?

Second Amendment Quiz

Let us consider some examples.

Former Metallica guitarist and Megadeth founder Dave Mustaine has called President Obama “the most divisive president we've ever had.”

Not only that, he’s become a birther, according to a Daily Beast report.

"I know he was born somewhere else than America," Mustaine told a Canadian television show. "How come he was invisible until became … whatever he was in Illinois?"

Rage Against the Machine guitarist Tom Morello writes in Rolling Stone that Republican vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan (who claims to be a fan of the band) “is the embodiment of the machine that our music has been raging against for two decades.”

“Don't mistake me, I clearly see that Ryan has a whole lotta ‘rage’ in him,” Morello writes. “A rage against women, a rage against immigrants, a rage against workers, a rage against gays, a rage against the poor, a rage against the environment. Basically the only thing he's not raging against is the privileged elite he's groveling in front of for campaign contributions.”

Rolling Stone, of course, is a kind of samizdat for political dissidents among the cultural elite.

At one of their concerts just before the US-led invasion of Iraq, the Dixie Chicks famously declared: “Just so you know…. We do not want this war, this violence, and we're ashamed that the President of the United States is from Texas.”
 
 And what can you say about Ted Nugent?

Among his less profane or vulgar political pronouncements, he’s described the Obama administration as "vile," "evil" and "America-hating,” and he’s suggested that if the President is reelected “I will either be dead or in jail by this time next year.”

For sure, government officials are keeping a close eye on such things.

Nugent toned things down for a minute or two when the Secret Service paid him a little visit.

“Ted Nugent, Kidd Rock, and Megadeth front man Dave Mustaine are all essentially on the record as foot soldiers in a war against Obama’s reelection,” Obama campaign manager Jim Messina was quoted as saying earlier this year. “As of today we will be dedicating time, money and resources to monitoring the onstage ramblings of political neophytes.”

“Monitoring?” That sure sounds like thought police to us.

We mentioned congressional hearings, where “Code Pink” protestors frequently pop up, waving signs and shouting imprecations and maledictions at lawmakers. They did it at President Bush’s second inaugural ceremony too.

Code Pink describes itself as “a women-initiated grassroots peace and social justice movement working to end US funded wars and occupations, to challenge militarism globally, and to redirect our resources into health care, education, green jobs and other life-affirming activities.”

If that’s not subversive of America’s natural political order, we don’t know what is. And would they get away with disrupting meetings of the Russian Parliament? We don’t think so.

That’s hooliganism plain and simple, and it needs to be dealt with appropriately.

For musician-activists disrespecting our national leaders, we recommend several hours of Lawrence Welk re-runs.

Second Amendment Quiz

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to What if US rockers were convicted of ‘hooliganism’ like Russia’s Pussy Riot?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2012/0818/What-if-US-rockers-were-convicted-of-hooliganism-like-Russia-s-Pussy-Riot
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe