Obama team battles to portray healthcare reform as cost-cutting
House and Senate bills on healthcare reform include most cost-cutting ideas that have surfaced in recent years, asserts Obama's budget director.
The Obama administration is battling to persuade a skeptical public that healthcare reform legislation will help to curb the runaway cost of medical care.Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
The White House effort could be pivotal as Senate lawmakers consider how to refine their bill ahead of what promises to be a narrow-margin vote.
"I’m very pleased with how [the Senate and House bills] are shaping up ... in cost containment," Nancy-Ann DeParle, the administration's health reform director, said in a news briefing Wednesday.
Peter Orszag, the White House budget director, said the legislation is expected to incorporate most of the major cost-control ideas that have emerged in recent years. Those include:
• Moving toward a "bundled-payment" system in which providers are paid for overall care – not for each test or procedure they perform.
• Starting to track what treatments work better than others (which could nudge hospitals toward more efficient care).
• Digitizing medical records to improve efficiency.
• Forming a Medicare commission to curb rising costs in the program that covers older Americans – and that accounts for a large share of expected federal budget deficits in the future.
The pre-Thanksgiving healthcare push comes at an important moment. The Senate is about to dig into the details of its bill, polls suggest that voters are wary about the prospect that costs will go up rather than down, and the calendar is ticking quickly toward an election year in which a voter focus on the economy could undercut momentum for healthcare reform.
Republican foes are attacking the legislation, questioning whether it will actually tame costs.
"Now it’s the American people’s turn to have their voices heard," Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell (R) of Kentucky said in a Nov. 21 statement. "For months, they have been asking Congress to do something about the high cost of healthcare and yet the sponsors of this bill responded with a half-trillion dollars in Medicare cuts, massive tax hikes, and an unsustainable expansion of new government programs which Congress’s non-partisan scorekeeper says will result in higher premiums."
In an ABC News/Washington Post poll this month, 52 percent of Americans said they expected their medical costs will rise with healthcare reforms, while 11 percent expected a decrease, and 35 percent expected no change. In this and other recent polls, the share of Americans opposing the Obama-backed reform plan is larger than the share supporting it.
Although important differences remain between the House and Senate bills, both appear headed toward a similar framework: All Americans would be asked to buy insurance, with the government footing the bill for those who are poorest and subsidizing millions with average incomes. The health insurance industry would reap a windfall of new revenue, but would have to cover people regardless of their medical conditions. Congress would also create a "public option" as an alternative to the private insurance plans.