Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search


'Death panel' controversy remains very much alive

Even some conservatives call the issue bogus. Meanwhile, the healthcare debate shifts to 'rationing.'

By Staff writer / August 21, 2009

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (here giving her resignation speech in July) has been charging that healthcare reform proposals in Congress would mean "death panels" for the elderly and others. Politifact.com gave her a "pants on fire" designation for "a sci-fi scenario not based in reality."

Al Grillo/AP/file

Enlarge

Washington

The “death panel” debate – it’s still alive.

Skip to next paragraph

The White House has pushed back hard against the notion – spread by former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, among others – that healthcare reform legislation might set up “death panels” that would control access to end-of-life care for the elderly.

“The president’s made some discernible progress on the mistruth about government making end-of-life healthcare decisions for seniors, which obviously isn’t going to happen,” said White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs on Friday. “It’s not in the bill.”

But some liberal groups have flipped the argument on its head, saying that private insurance firms, with their power to deny claims by policyholders, are the real “death panels.” And some Republicans have used the “death panel” term as a jumping-off point to discuss a larger issue – government rationing of services, which they say might be the result of healthcare reform’s passage.

“When Sarah Palin said that the emerging healthcare reform legislation would lead to ‘death panels’ and government rationing of care, her language was explosive, but her premise about rationing was not,” wrote former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich in a Los Angeles Times opinion article this week.

Palin’s “death panel” charge pointed at a provision in the House version of health legislation that would fund voluntary end-of-life counseling sessions. It has been widely debunked by fact-checking journalism organizations. The Pulitzer-prize winning site Politifact gave Palin a “Pants on Fire” designation for the remark.

Still, Senate Democrats quickly pulled the counseling provision from their version of the bill. For some voters, this may have confirmed their suspicions of the provision’s intention.

A Pew Research Center poll released Aug. 20 found that 86 percent of respondents had heard of the “death panel” controversy. Of those people, 50 percent thought the charge to be false. Thirty percent said it was true.

However, a plurality of Republican respondents, 47 percent, thought that the health legislation would indeed create “death panels.”

While Palin’s charge was over the top, it was just an extreme example of the overall rhetoric surrounding the healthcare reform effort, says Thomas Schaller, a professor of political science at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County.