Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

  • Advertisements

Palin's decision to resign: Is it smart?

Some analysts say her political career is over. Others say she will be in a better position now to run for national office.

By Peter Grier and Gail Russell ChaddockStaff writers / July 3, 2009

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin announced Friday that she is stepping down from office on July 26, after serving 2-1/2 years of her four-year term. She did not reveal her plans.

Robert DeBerry/The Mat-Su Valley Frontiersman/AP

Enlarge

Washington

Why is Sarah Palin resigning as governor of Alaska?

Skip to next paragraph

She has not said, exactly. At her surprise announcement on Friday that she would step down from office July 26, she said only that she did not want to be a lame-duck statehouse executive “in this particular climate.”

But the move does make sense if Governor Palin has her sights on national office.

Free to move about the country

For one thing, she won’t have to live in Alaska. At least, she won’t have to be in Alaska for her day job. Presidential hopefuls generally spend much time testing the waters with short trips to New Hampshire and Iowa. Nothing against the Last Frontier, but it is a long way from Nashua.

Palin needs to leave home if she wants to promote her national presence, says Gerald McBeath, a political scientist at the University of Alaska at Fairbanks. “This is Alaska. It’s remote and isolated, and it’s not a good place to operate if you want a national presence,” he says.

Crunch time for governors, in general

Second, Palin now won’t have to make decisions that could cause her political trouble down the road. It’s no secret that the recession is making this a tough time to be a governor. Around the country, many are struggling to cut spending and are even raising taxes to try to keep their budgets in the black. All Palin has to do is look south to California and see GOP Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s troubles if she wants a glimpse of how bad things can get.

Fewer financial strictures

Finally, now she’ll be free to build a national team and, even more important, raise national money. As a private citizen, she will have more flexibility to give speeches at hefty fees and meet with wealthy donors whose backing, and whose friends’ backing, she will need if she does decide to try for the Oval Office in 2012.

She will also have more time to raise money and campaign for other Republicans around the US. That is an important and rational way of building good will and support for a national run. Both Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon traveled the nation for the GOP before their own presidential runs, notes Grover Norquist, president of the Americans for Tax Reform, a conservative antitax group.