Secretary Shinseki 'mad as hell' over VA deaths, not ready to resign

Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki faced a Senate panel Thursday over charges that VA hospitals on his watch 'cooked the books,' leading to delays in treatment that resulted in dozens of deaths.

|
Jonathan Ernst/Reuters
US Department of Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki (l.) addresses reporters after testifying before a Senate Veterans Affairs Committee hearing on VA health care, on Capitol Hill in Washington on Thursday.

When retired Gen. Eric Shinseki took the helm of the Department of Veterans Affairs six years ago, he came into the job as a hero – a decorated and wounded veteran himself with a reputation for speaking truth to power.

On Thursday, he came before the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee to answer to lawmakers who were less inclined to sing his praises than they had been when they unanimously confirmed him for the post. The opening statements from senators asking when heads would roll ran for nearly an hour.

“Today will be a little contentious,” Sen. Mark Begich (D) of Alaska warned Secretary Shinseki. “No doubt about it.” 

The serious charge that inspired the hearing is an allegation of “cooking the books” against a Phoenix VA hospital that, a whistleblower alleges, led to wait times that may have contributed to the deaths of dozens of patients seeking cancer treatment. Similar charges have since cropped up against VA hospitals in a handful of other states.

For this, the American Legion, along with several Republican lawmakers, has called on Shinseki to step down – the first time since 1978 that the veterans’ organization has asked for the resignation of a public official.

But Shinseki does not appear ready to fall on his sword just yet. The allegations, if true, make him “mad as hell,” he said, adding that he “could use stronger language here, but, in deference to the committee, I won’t.” It was an emotionally raw moment for the secretary, who has never been accused of having an overly ebullient speaking style.

When asked whether he plans to resign, Shinseki noted that he served at the pleasure of the president, but made it clear that he feels there is much left for him to do. “I came here to make things better for veterans,” he said. “This is not my job – I’m here to accomplish a mission that I think they critically deserve and need.” 

While few lawmakers found it politically pragmatic to rush to his defense, some did note that he inherited a broken system that would be tough for any official to fix in short order. One senator pointed out that the VA serves more than 10 million veterans, which is greater than the population of many states. When he came to office, one official noted that Shinseki inherited a “pre-World War II” filing system that was primarily paper-based, rather than computerized.

For his part, Shinseki said the American Customer Satisfaction Index – a benchmark for the public and private sectors – has found in independent surveys that VA customer satisfaction is “among the best in the nation – equal to or better than ratings for private-sector hospitals.”

Of the more than 300,000 employees in the VA health-care system, medical providers and appointment schedules received satisfaction scores of over 90 percent. “Despite these and other favorable statistics, we know that we can always improve,” Shinseki added. 

Veterans advocacy organizations acknowledged that after veterans enter the system, they are generally treated well. “Their actual individual care is incredibly positive,” said Tom Tarantino, chief policy officer for the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, who testified before the committee in the second of three panels following Shinseki’s appearance. Shinseki stayed on through all three panels, sitting in the audience to listen to the concerns of representatives of veterans organizations who testified after his panel was adjourned. 

Shinseki told lawmakers he expects that the VA's inspector general will be able to complete its investigation of the Phoenix VA hospital in less than a month and report back to Congress. “We’ll shoot for three weeks,” Shinseki said. 

The highly anticipated report will no doubt be the subject of another hearing as soon as it’s delivered to lawmakers. 

For now, the White House on Wednesday assigned Deputy Chief of Staff Rob Nabors to oversee a review of the VA. Quickly on the heels of this announcement, Republic National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus called for an independent counsel, decrying an “insider-led investigation” for a scandal that “continues to grow every day.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Secretary Shinseki 'mad as hell' over VA deaths, not ready to resign
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2014/0515/Secretary-Shinseki-mad-as-hell-over-VA-deaths-not-ready-to-resign
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe