Did David Petraeus drop hint about future plans in speech?

Retired Gen. David Petraeus returned to the public eye with a speech about veterans affairs Tuesday. The topic of the speech could offer clues about his next public role, a friend says.

|
Alex Gallardo/Reuters
Former CIA Director and retired Gen. David Petraeus speaks as the keynote speaker at the University of Southern California annual dinner for veterans and ROTC students in Los Angeles.

With his speech at the University of Southern California Tuesday night, retired Gen. David Petraeus – commander of America’s wars in Iraq and Afghanistan before becoming director of the Central Intelligence Agency – effectively signaled his return to public life. 

In apologizing for the extramarital affair that ruined his career and expressing a desire to move forward, Mr. Petraeus – once thought of as a potential presidential candidate – has sparked questions about what his second act might be. 

The scheduled topic – about veterans affairs – might offer clues.

Though the speech was planned before Mr. Petraeus resigned from the CIA, according to one of his longtime friends, it showed at least one way that the former general might contribute to the national security debate going forward.

“This is something he may look towards in the future, as far as veterans issues go,” says the friend, who spoke to the Monitor only on condition that he not be named.

Veterans support groups “are well intended, but they’re not pulling in the same direction,” the friend adds. Given his stature, Petraeus could “gather the groups together” and help them prioritize.

Whether or not Petraeus has any broader designs in returning to the public eye, the issue of veterans affairs is one of some urgency for the Pentagon as it ends two wars.

While the Pentagon has a responsibility to prepare troops for their departure from the service, it’s a job at which the military hasn’t excelled in the past, says Sgt. Maj. Bryan Battaglia, the senior enlisted adviser to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Commanders tend to focus on preparing troops for battle, rather than for becoming civilians again. But that approach needs to change, Major Battaglia says.

“If we’re not doing that, shame on us,” he says.

It is a topic Petraeus picked up in his speech. “There is often a view that, because an individual was a great soldier, he or she will naturally do well in and transition effortlessly to the civilian world.”

“In reality, the transition from military service to civilian pursuits often is quite challenging,” he added.

The longtime friend imagines that Petraeus could help veterans' groups choose their top five issues. "He’d have the name recognition and abilities to perhaps get them together.”

In the meantime, speeches like the one Tuesday give him an opportunity to rehabilitate his image. Petraeus began his speech by acknowledging his wrongdoing.

“Needless to say, I join you keenly aware that I am regarded in a different light now than I was a year ago,” he said. “I am also keenly aware that the reason for my recent journey was my own doing.”
 
 He reiterated “how deeply I regret – and apologize for – the circumstances that led me to resign from the CIA and caused such pain for my family, friends, and supporters.”

That said, the public can be forgiving. “He didn’t rob a bank, he’s not a mass murderer, he didn’t steal a bunch of old peoples’ retirement funds,” the friend argues, adding that the apology is very much in keeping with Petraeus’s personal philosophy.

As a commander, “He’s always been one to own up to what you did, then move forward,” the friend adds. “Just don’t do it again.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Did David Petraeus drop hint about future plans in speech?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2013/0327/Did-David-Petraeus-drop-hint-about-future-plans-in-speech
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe