Who is winning Afghanistan war? US officials increasingly disagree.
Gen. David Petraeus is on Capitol Hill this week to give a positive message about the course of the Afghanistan war. But some key US officials disagree with his assessment.
(Page 2 of 2)
While US troops have had some tactical victories in the east and removed “several key leaders from the battlefield … this does not appear to have affected their operational capacity, which included conducting several high-profile attacks against [NATO] bases in 2010,” Burgess stressed.Skip to next paragraph
In Pictures Fighting continues in Afghanistan
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Sen. John McCain, the Senate Armed Service Committee’s top Republican, pointed out these contrasts in testimony Tuesday. Petraeus responded: “With respect, I have tried to avoid what might be labeled optimism or pessimism,” he said, “and have tried to provide realism.”
Petraeus not alone
He is not the only military commander on the ground whose assessments have differed from those of US intelligence officials. In a Pentagon briefing earlier this month, Maj. Gen. Richard Mills, commanding general of US troops in southwest Afghanistan, told reporters that the Taliban is “short money – there’s no question about that – both from his lack of drugs to sell and from his other fund-raisers that have … been unsuccessful.”
Mills added that “a number of programs that the government of Afghanistan [has] instituted I believe has had a dramatic impact on the amount of poppy.”
Burgess, however, had another take on Taliban finances. He attributed the drop in poppy yield to a disease in the south, and he suggested that farmers made up the difference by charging more for poppy to make up for the decline in opium yields. While the Taliban have experienced some financial constraints, he added, “They have remained able to sufficiently fund fighters through various funding streams.”
Mills's testimony also contrasted with that of National Intelligence Director Clapper on the subject of so-called "alternative livelihood" programs that help farmers switch from poppy to legal crops.
Mills said the Afghan government “has a very effective crop-introduction program in lieu of poppy … that has proven to be very, very popular.”
Clapper differed. “Alternative livelihood programs designed to encourage Afghan farmers to end poppy cultivation will not significantly discourage farmers from planting poppy in 2011,” he told the Senate committee, “primarily because a lack of security impedes their implementation on a large scale.”
It is this security that remains paramount – and elusive – for US troops. On this point US military and intelligence officials are in agreement. Petraeus told the committee that “much difficult work lies ahead” for US troops.
Burgess agreed in an even more blunt assessment. “Afghanistan,” he warned, “will experience record levels of violence through 2011.”