Subscribe

Police and protesters clash at Portland city hall over law enforcement contract

Portland demonstrators sought to stall a new police contract that increased pay for officers and raised questions about body camera policy.

  • close
    Demonstrators partake in a protest outside of City Hall in Portland, Ore., Wednesday, Oct. 12, 2016. The Portland City Council approved a new police contract in a conference room that was blocked off from the general public because of protests that led to arrests.
    Mike Zacchino/ The Oregonian via AP
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

Police used pepper spray and made arrests as demonstrators stormed City Hall in Portland, Oregon on Wednesday and tried to stop the City Council from voting on a new police contract that includes more pay for officers and raised questions about the future use of body cameras.

The demonstration forced Mayor Charlie Hales to stop the meeting, but city commissioners soon reconvened in a secure, third-floor room to vote while protesters from Black Lives Matter and Don't Shoot PDX were kept below.

Amid chants and shouts from below, the commissioners voted 3-1 in favor of the new contract, setting off another round of protests that briefly blocked public transit in the downtown core.

Protesters threw object at officers both inside and outside City Hall, the Portland Police Bureau said in a statement.

Protesters dispersed as darkness fell, but organizers said a demonstration was planned for Friday.

Hales' decision to move the meeting was unprecedented in recent city history, The Oregonian/OregonLive reported. The vote was streamed live on the city's home page.

Police eventually forced the protesters out of City Hall and into the streets.

Several were hit by pepper spray as officers cleared the doors.

Hales, the outgoing mayor, said the contract was "good for Portland."

Protesters were angry that Hales was bringing the matter to a vote now instead of letting his successor, Mayor-Elect Ted Wheeler, take up the issue in January so there could be more time for public input.

Police watchdog groups grew concerned earlier this month when an initial version of the contract guaranteed officers the right to view body camera footage before writing up any non-fatal encounters with civilians.

That language led to several smaller protests in the weeks leading up to Wednesday's vote.

Transparency advocates say that allowing police to view footage prior to writing their reports can "inform officers' accounts of an event in such a way that could be detrimental to civilians when they testify in court," The Christian Science Monitor reported in August:

According to [Chad Marlow of the American Civil Liberties Union], allowing officers to view body camera videos of an incident before they write their initial report, while preventing the civilians involved from seeing those videos, can naturally give officers an edge in judicial proceedings by allowing them to shape their story to the available evidence.

Commissioner Nick Fish told KATU-TV in a live interview Wednesday that the contract did not include any language on body camera policy.

"It was carved out and will be discussed with the community later," Fish told the station.

In a blog post Tuesday, Police Chief Mike Marshman said the new contract was urgently needed to help the city recruit new officers.

By the end of the month, the 880-member Portland Police Bureau will have nearly 90 vacancies due to retirements and another 385 officers are projected to retire in the next five years.

Better pay will help the city entice new hires and could deter current officers from leaving to work elsewhere, he said.

Marshman also reassured the public in his statement that any policies developed around body cameras will include public input.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK