Supreme Court rejects challenge to assault weapons bans in Conn. and N.Y.

On Monday, the justices rejected a challenge to assault weapons bans in two states. The laws were originally passed in response to the gun massacre at an elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut in 2012. 

|
Carlos Barria/ Reuters/ File
A pedestrian walks in front of the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C. on May 19, 2016. On Monday, the Court rejected challenges to assault weapons bans in Connecticut and New York.

The Supreme Court has rejected challenges to assault weapons bans in Connecticut and New York, in the aftermath of the shooting attack on a gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida, that left 50 people dead.

The justices on Monday left in place a lower court ruling that upheld laws that were passed in response to another mass shooting involving a semi-automatic weapon, the elementary school attack in Newtown, Connecticut.

The Supreme Court has repeatedly turned away challenges to gun restrictions since two landmark decisions that spelled out the right to a handgun to defend one's own home.

In December, less than a month after a mass shooting in San Bernardino, California, Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia dissented when the court refused to hear an appeal to overturn a Chicago suburb's ban on assault weapons. Scalia died in February.

Seven states and the District of Columbia have enacted laws banning assault weapons. The others are California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts and New Jersey, according to the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. In addition, Minnesota and Virginia regulate assault weapons, the center said.

Yet attacks with semiautomatic rifles do not represent a significant percentage of gun violence, some analysts and gun rights advocates say, arguing that such bans and limitations are more "cosmetic" than effective, as The Christian Science Monitor reported in October:

"It has become a gun rights meme, that these gun bans are all cosmetic," says Saul Cornell, chair of American history at Fordham University in New York and an expert in Second Amendment issues. "And at the level of ballistics, that may be true," he says, since other semiautomatic weapons could be just as lethal.

"But when you have people with impulse control issues, and you give them this very lethal and very effective tool, they will do more damage with it."

And Professor Cornell believes that many of the perpetrators of mass shootings are enamored of the military style of these weapons, a "cosmetic" paramilitary look they seek to emulate.

Connecticut and New York enacted bans on assault weapons and large-capacity magazines in response to the December 2012 massacre of 20 children and six educators at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. The gunman, Adam Lanza, shot and killed his mother before driving to the school where he gunned down the victims with a Bushmaster AR-15 rifle. Lanza then killed himself.

In Orlando, gunman Omar Mateen used a Sig Sauer MCX semi-automatic rifle and a pistol during the attack at Pulse nightclub. Mateen was killed in a shootout with police after killing 49 others.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Supreme Court rejects challenge to assault weapons bans in Conn. and N.Y.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2016/0620/Supreme-Court-rejects-challenge-to-assault-weapons-bans-in-Conn.-and-N.Y
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe