Subscribe
First Look

Did DOJ attorneys lie to a federal judge about Obama immigration plans?

Texas Federal Judge Andrew Hanen orders Department of Justice attorneys to take ethics classes over statements made during a 2014 hearing for a lawsuit challenging the president's controversial immigration programs.

  • close
    US Southern District Judge Andrew Hanen (l.) recites the Pledge of Allegiance during a 2015 courthouse naming ceremony in Brownsville, Texas. Judge Hanen ordered Department of Justice attorney's to take ethics classes after he determined they had not told the truth regarding the implementation of one element of President Obama’s executive action on immigration.
    Brad Doherty/The Brownsville Herald/AP/File
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

A Texas federal judge has ordered Justice Department attorneys to take annual ethics classes after he ruled they misled him regarding the implementation one part of President Obama's controversial immigration programs.

In late 2014, Texas and 25 other states filed a lawsuit challenging Mr. Obama's proposed executive actions that could protect around 4 million people from deportation and make them eligible to work in the United States.

Afterward, Judge Andrew Hanen of the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, ordered a preliminary injunction blocking them. Before issuing the injunction, Justice Department attorneys told Judge Hanen that one program that protects children who were brought to the US illegally from deportation had not yet begun.

However, federal officials later said they had renewed the rights of more than 108,000 people to protection from deportation and given them work permits. Justice Department attorneys had previously insisted the protections were granted under 2012 guidelines, which weren't stopped by the injunction.

In a strongly worded order, which included movie references to "Miracle on 34th Street" and "Bridge of Spies," Hanen wrote that one thing was "indisputably clear," DOJ attorneys had misrepresented the facts.

"For whatever reason, the Justice Department trial lawyers appearing in this court chose not to tell the truth about this (Department of Homeland Security) activity," he wrote. "Such conduct is certainly not worthy of any department whose name includes the word 'Justice.' Suffice it to say, the citizens of all fifty states, their counsel, the affected (immigrants) and the judiciary all deserve better."

In an e-mail to the Associated Press, Justice Department spokesman Patrick Rodenbush said his agency "strongly disagrees with the order."

Hanen demanded that federal officials produce a list of the individuals who were given the three-year protections and that this information may be passed on to officials in states where these immigrants live. According to The New York Times, he said he would keep the list under seal until the US Supreme Court decides the fate of Obama's immigration plans. 

"All personal identifiers and locaters including names, addresses, 'A' file numbers and all available contact information, together with the date the three-year renewal or approval was granted," the Times reported.

Hanen also ordered that any DOJ attorney in Washington, D.C., who needs to appear in a state or federal court in any of the 26 states that are part of the lawsuit will have to annually attend, for the next five years, a legal ethics course.

Furthermore, he ordered US Attorney General Loretta Lynch to present him with a comprehensive plan to prevent "this unethical conduct from ever occurring again" within 60 days.

Thursday's order does not effect the executive actions, which Hanen and the other states previously blocked. The Supreme Court heard arguments on the actions earlier this year and is expected to issue a ruling by the end of June. The case was argued before the high court in April.

The other states attempting to block Obama's orders are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.

This report contains material from AP. 

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK