Chicago police watchdog submits to audit: Will things change?

The Independent Review Police Authority was established in 2007 to monitor the Chicago Police Department. Now, nearly a decade later, that agency has been accused of enabling the 'systemic racism' it was supposed to root out.

|
M. Spencer Green/AP
Sharon Fairley, chief administrator of the Independent Police Review Authority for the city of Chicago, speaks at a news conference Wednesday, in Chicago. Ms. Fairly introduced her staff and highlighted changes that have taken place in the first 100 days since she took over the agency.

Chicago took another step Wednesday to improve the transparency and accountability of its police department after months of protests and criticisms that the force has acted unfairly against minority communities.

A law firm will conduct a six-month audit of the city's Independent Police Review Authority (IPRA) to probe the civil review board for systemic bias, with results available to the public. The review is needed, said the organization's head Sharon Fairley, because it has upheld so few complaints in its nine years of existence, only faulting officers in police shootings on two occasions.

The city created the IPRA in 2007 in response to calls for police reform after two videos of shocking police violence and ensuing protest that cost the Chicago police chief his job. Another wave of protests and debate following last year's release of footage from a 2014 police shooting have convinced many that this organization has not served its purpose but has instead entrenched "systemic racism" in police operations.

"The current system of IPRA is one of the main things that has allowed the code of silence to flourish in the Chicago Police Department," Sheila Bedi, a professor of law at Northwestern University, told the Associated Press. "It needs to be abolished and entirely reconstituted."

New IPRA head Fairley pledged in December to repair the agency, with an independent review offering a possible first step to improving the police department's damaged community relations.

“There is a direct correlation between IPRA’s dysfunction outlined in this complaint and the brutality that is and has been endemic in the CPD,” read the complaint from the Chicago Aldermanic Black Caucus and the Rainbow PUSH Coalition, among others.

The city's coalition for civil rights began calling to replace the IPRA in December, after a newly released video showed a white police officer shoot a black man 16 times for refusing to drop a knife, with many shots fired after the man had dropped to the ground. The problem, an original IPRA advocate-turned-critic told The Christian Science Monitor, is the agency inherited the same staff as the watchdog organization it was designed to replace.

The law firm conducting this review, McGuireWoods, has offices across the United States and Europe, including one in Illinois. The city's selection of a separate, private organization for the audit directly answers the criticism that IPRA simply took on the former staff of its predecessor organization, although some had called last year for the agency to be replaced entirely.

This announcement comes one month after an announcement from the Chicago Police Department that its call for new recruits had been answered with its most diverse applicant pool ever. Both announcements suggested potential for improvement, community leaders have said, and they hope the city's follow-through will be equally encouraging.

"I’m happy the applicants responded," Jedidiah Brown, president of the Chicago Young Leaders Alliance, told the Monitor. "I’m on standby for what the administration is going to do."

This report includes material from The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Chicago police watchdog submits to audit: Will things change?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2016/0324/Chicago-police-watchdog-submits-to-audit-Will-things-change
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe