Chicago cop's conflicted account of fatal shooting raises questions

Two different pictures are emerging from the account of what happened when a Chicago police officer fatally shot a college student and his neighbor in the West Erie area of Chicago.

|
Joshua Lott/Reuters/File
Janet Cooksey (l.) is embraced as she attends the funeral for her son Quintonio LeGrier in Chicago, Jan. 9. The US Department of Justice is investigating the city police department over its use of deadly force, especially against minorities. The shooting deaths of two black people – college student Quintonio LeGrier, 19, and Bettie Jones, a grandmother of 10 – by a police officer late last month have increased tensions.

Two different pictures are emerging from the account of what happened when a Chicago police officer fatally shot a college student and his neighbor in the West Erie area of Chicago.

In his initial conversation with investigators, Officer Robert Rialmo said that Quintonio LeGrier, who is black, was holding a baseball bat over his head and refused to drop it before the officer fired. Two days later, Mr. Rialmo said that Mr. LeGrier tried to hit him with the bat twice.

Attorney Basileios Foutris, who represents LeGrier's father, told The Associated Press that Rialmo added details to his second account in order to justify using force. LeGrier was shot six times by the police on Dec. 26. He neighbor Bettie Jones, a grandmother of 10, was also killed in the shooting.

The account detailed in recorded calls to 911 is murky. LeGrier called the police three separate times asking for officer assistance, saying that his life was in danger, NBC Chicago reports. Each time, the dispatcher hung up on him  when he refused to provide specific details of the emergency. Just one minute after the third call, LeGrier’s father called 911, saying that his son was threatening him.

In a statement, Chicago’s Office of Emergency Management and Communications said that "call takers are required to ask specific questions to determine the nature of the event, determine if such a request warrants and emergency response and dispatch proper resources. Call takers follow specific protocols and may only terminate a call as a last resort."

City leadership in Chicago is currently under scrutiny for how the Chicago police force has handled its interactions with the black community. In November and December of last year, the city was finally forced to release two separate videos that depicted white officers fatally shooting young black men.

Mayor Rahm Emanuel publicly apologized for how the city handled the release of the November video that showed Officer Jason Van Dyke fatally shooting teenager Laquan McDonald, and vowed "complete and total reform” of the Chicago Police Department, but his public apology was met with protests and calls for his resignation.

Part of the problem for creating greater accountability among police forces nationwide is the lack of concrete data on how many people are fatally shot by police. While body cameras and grand jury reforms can help, transparent statistics will go a long way toward lowering existing trends, law enforcement experts say. But because most data is self-reported, there are few easy ways to improve its accuracy.

In December, Emanuel responded to critic by creating a task force focused on reforms in Chicago’s Police Department. One of the task force’s first initiatives, in February, was to shorten the turnaround time on when videos and other evidence related to police-involved shootings would be released to the public. The wait time will now be as short as 60 days.

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Chicago cop's conflicted account of fatal shooting raises questions
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2016/0318/Chicago-cop-s-conflicted-account-of-fatal-shooting-raises-questions
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe