Were police justified in shooting an Oregon occupier in the back?

Prosecutors say the shooting death of Malheur National Wildlife Refuge occupier Robert 'LaVoy' Finicum was justified by his actions, despite objections from his family.

|
Jim Urquhart/Reuters/File
A memorial for Robert 'LaVoy' Finicum is seen where he was shot and killed by law enforcement on a highway north of Burns, Ore., January 30.

Law enforcement officers responsible for shooting Robert "LaVoy" Finicum, a protester who was involved in the occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Oregon, are under fire for their handling of the violent confrontation.

Two Federal Bureau of Investigation agents who were at the scene of Mr. Finicum’s shooting death are under investigation for failing to disclose that they fired two shots at the man. And the shooting itself is being criticized by Finicum’s relatives, despite a county prosecutor’s assessment that the shooting was justified.

“The six shots fired by the Oregon State Police were justified and in fact necessary,” Malheur County District Attorney Dan Norris told reporters at a news conference in Bend, Ore.

Finicum was shot three times in the back on Jan. 26 during a confrontation between Malheur occupiers and law enforcement after being pulled over at a police stop. Driving a truck, Finicum eventually sped past the officers at the stop, who pursued, before arriving at another roadblock. Finicum crashed into a snowbank after three shots were fired because the truck was viewed as a threat to law enforcement, according to Deschutes County Sheriff Shane Nelson.

Finicum then exited the vehicle and an FBI agent fired two more shots. He then yelled “you're going to have to shoot me” while repeatedly reaching into his jacket and was shot three times by troopers at the scene. A loaded pistol was found in his jacket.

Investigators say Finicum’s near collision with an officer at the roadblock and potentially reaching for his gun justified the shooting. Finicum’s widow, however, believes the situation unfolded differently.

“He was walking with his hands in the air. A symbol of surrender,” Jeanette Finicum read in a prepared statement St. George, Utah, on Tuesday. “We have talked with an independent investigator who has stated that the video provides a setup assassination.”

A newly synced video of the confrontation shows Finicum with his hands in the air before apparently reaching for something in his jacket, at which point an officer can be seen opening fire.

“Mr. Finicum repeatedly and knowingly made choices that put him in this situation,” Harney County District Attorney Tim Colahan said in a statement. “It was not the outcome that any of us wanted but one he, alone, is responsible for.”

The US Department of Justice on Tuesday announced that it would be investigating the FBI team responsible for the agents who failed to report their shooting.

The last occupiers of the Malheur refuge were arrested on Feb. 17 after a standoff of more than six weeks.

Material from Reuters and The Associated Press was used in this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Were police justified in shooting an Oregon occupier in the back?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2016/0309/Were-police-justified-in-shooting-an-Oregon-occupier-in-the-back
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe