After Rebecca Sedwick suicide, a bid to hold parents liable for kids' cyberbullying
In Florida, the Rebecca Sedwick suicide has triggered plans for legislation to hold parents criminally liable if they don't do enough to stop their kids from cyberbullying. If enacted, it would be a first in North America.
Florida attorney Mark O’Mara is stepping onto center stage in the debate over how much parents should be held responsible for children’s cyberbullying. He plans to draft legislation to impose criminal liability on parents who show “willful blindness or gross negligence” to the kind of online torment allegedly inflicted on Rebecca Sedwick, for which two girls were recently arrested.Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
“If a child kills someone while operating a parent’s car, the parents can be held responsible. If a child kills someone while using a parent’s gun, the parent can be held responsible. If a child breaks the law using a computer or cellphone provided by the parent, how is that different?” wrote Mr. O’Mara, who served as defense attorney for George Zimmerman in this year's Trayvon Martin murder trial, in his "O’Mara Law Blog" on Thursday.
If such a law were to go forward, it would be the first in North America to hold parents criminally liable for cyberbullying, experts on law and bullying say.
RECOMMENDED: Top 5 bullying myths
The Canadian province of Nova Scotia has a new law that could be looked to as a model for protecting cyberbullying victims and holding parents accountable. The Cyber-Safety Act allows victims to sue cyberbullies, and parents can be held civilly liable for damages if the bully is a minor and they haven’t properly supervised his or her use of electronic media.
Despite people’s sense of urgency to do something about severe bullying, a criminal law would be a “knee-jerk reaction” and possibly a violation of the Constitution, says Parry Aftab, a New Jersey-based lawyer and a cyberbullying expert. “I understand how there may be consideration of laws to hold parents liable,” she says, especially if they knew about cyberbullying and encouraged it or allowed it to continue, but if such a law were to broadly hold parents accountable for young people’s online activity, “all of us could go to jail,” she says.
Liability for children’s use of cars and guns is different from liability for their communications, says Jesse Weins, a criminal justice professor at Dakota Wesleyan University in Mitchell, S.D. “Maybe we’re willing to say communication can be a deadly weapon, but we’re not sure of that,” he says, and it would be a controversial “broad stroke” to hold parents liable for all of their children’s electronic communications.
Even parents who are careful and think they are monitoring their children’s use of cellphones and social media can miss some of what their kids are doing, Ms. Aftab says. Instead of putting resources into pushing a law to make parents criminals, she says, “I’d rather have the time and money put into better education, teaching the kids where to report things, how to get help … and making sure [cyberbullies] go to mandated counseling.”