Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search


9/11 cases: Three of five Guantánamo detainees skip pretrial hearing

A military commission judge said Monday the defendants don't have to attend the proceedings, and on Tuesday Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and two other Guantánamo detainees opted out. It's a day-by-day decision.

(Page 2 of 2)



The hearings are being conducted in a specially built high-security courtroom on the US Naval Base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. In addition to reporters present in court, other members of the media are monitoring the proceedings via a video feed at Fort Meade, Md.

Skip to next paragraph

In other action, Judge Pohl ruled that detainees would be permitted to decide for themselves what they wished to wear while present in court.

Defense lawyers had complained that security officials in charge of the detention facility at Guantánamo had barred the defendants from wearing certain articles of clothing in court. The officials had refused to allow a detainee to wear an orange jump suit and refused to allow other detainees to wear camouflage jackets and vests.

A government lawyer, Marine Maj. Joshua Kirk, said the detention officials were trying to uphold the dignity and decorum of the military commission process. He said officials were concerned that detainees might try to use their clothing for propaganda purposes to convey that they were legitimate combatants rather than terrorists.

He also said security officials objected to detainees wearing any clothing with pockets in which contraband or weapons could be concealed.

One of Mohammed’s lawyers, Army Capt. Jason Wright, said the Geneva Conventions recognized that certain paramilitary and resistance groups are entitled to some legal protections when they wore clothing on the battlefield that distinguished themselves as combatants.

Wright noted that Mohammed had been part of the Afghan Mujahideen that fought the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. He added that the effort received the covert support of the United States government.

“Did they have a uniform?” Pohl asked.

“Mr. Mohammed wore a uniform,” Wright answered.

“The fact that he chose to wear parts of some uniform doesn’t mean it is a uniform,” the judge said.

Wright replied that even wearing a military-style jacket would qualify as a uniform under the Geneva Conventions.

The defense lawyer added that if pockets were a security concern they could be sewed over or removed.

Pohl said that he would not attempt to dictate to security officials what the detainee must wear while in the detention camp. But he said it was up to him to decide how detainees would be dressed while in his courtroom as defendants. Pohl ruled that the defendants would be free to come to court in prison garb, if they so chose, provided it was the same kind of detention clothing they routinely wore.

In addition, he approved the defense request to allow the defendants to wear camouflage jackets or vests to court. But the judge said the defendants would be barred from wearing a uniform or portion of a uniform worn by any branch of the American military.

Permissions

  • Weekly review of global news and ideas
  • Balanced, insightful and trustworthy
  • Subscribe in print or digital

Special Offer

 

Editors' picks

Doing Good

 

What happens when ordinary people decide to pay it forward? Extraordinary change...

Danny Bent poses at the starting line of the Boston Marathon in Hopkinton, Mass.

After the Boston Marathon bombings, Danny Bent took on a cross-country challenge

The athlete-adventurer co-founded a relay run called One Run for Boston that started in Los Angeles and ended at the marathon finish line to raise funds for victims.

 
 
Become a fan! Follow us! Google+ YouTube See our feeds!