Skip to footer

Tyler Clementi and cyberbullying: how courts ruled in five other cases

The trial for the roommate of former Rutgers University Tyler Clementi will be watched by legal experts nationwide to see how the court addresses the growing issue of cyberbullying. Here is a list of court proceedings where cyberbullying or Internet privacy invasion was a key issue. 

4. J.S. v. Bethlehem Area School District (2002)

In 1998, Justin Swidler, a 14-year-old middle school student in Pennsylvania, created his own website on his home computer that contained derogatory, profane, and threatening comments about his algebra teacher and principal. Among other things, the site showed a picture of his teacher’s head dripping with blood near and a caption that stated, “Why should she die?” listing several reasons why she should be killed.

The teacher allegedly suffered such extreme distress that she applied for medical leave. The school board concluded that because the website had such a demoralizing impact on the entire school community, Justin ought to be expelled.

Justin argued that the website was not to a true threat and was merely an exaggeration of his feelings about the teacher.

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania ruled that the website was indeed not a true threat, but they also decided it was not against the student’s First Amendment rights for school officials to expel him, even though he created the website off-campus. The court wrote, “In sum, the website created disorder and significantly adversely impacted the delivery instruction.”

4 of 5
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.