Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search


Michael Jackson doctor declines to testify. Was that his last, best chance?

Both the prosecution and the defense rested in the involuntary murder trial of Michael Jackson's physician as Dr. Conrad Murray declined to testify. Cross examination would have been brutal, analysts say.

By Staff writer / November 1, 2011

Dr. Conrad Murray stands with his attorneys in the courtroom after the defense rested its case during his trial in the death of pop star Michael Jackson in Los Angeles November 1.

Kevork Djansezian/Reuters

Enlarge

After 22 days of intense testimony, both the prosecution and the defense rested their cases on Tuesday in the involuntary murder trial of Michael Jackson’s former physician, Conrad Murray.

Skip to next paragraph

The announcements came after a brief, dramatic moment when the king of pop’s former doctor was asked by Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor whether he wanted to testify on his own behalf.

Dr. Murray, a Las Vegas cardiologist, informed the judge, outside the jury’s presence, that he did not wish to take the stand.

Murray might have made a sympathetic witness had he chosen to express his grief over the loss of Jackson, whom he has called a close friend. But trial analysts note that he would have come under blistering cross examination by Deputy District Attorney David Walgren, who would highlight every unanswered question about Jackson’s death.

Closing arguments in the case are set to begin on Thursday at the Los Angeles County Courthouse. Jury deliberations will likely begin later that day.

The high-profile case featured a clash of medical experts and two sharply divergent theories of what may have happened in the final hours of Mr. Jackson’s life on June 25, 2009.

Murray was charged with administering a lethal dose of the anesthetic propofol in an effort to help treat Jackson’s chronic insomnia. He faces up to four years in prison if convicted and loss of his medical license.

Prosecutors and their experts maintain that Murray set up an automatic drip of the anesthetic and that he became distracted while visiting a rest room and making telephone calls. At some point, they say, Jackson stopped breathing and died. They say Murray is responsible for the death, not only because he administered the drugs found in Jackson’s system, but also because he left the bedside of his heavily-sedated patient.

One prosecution expert said Murray’s actions were akin to leaving a sleeping infant on a kitchen counter.

Defense lawyers and their experts offered a completely different scenario. They suggested that Jackson self-administered a fatal combination of sedatives and propofol in a desperate attempt to get some sleep. They noted that Jackson told Murray that he enjoyed injecting propofol into his system, and they speculated that Jackson awakened while Murray was out of the room or distracted, and pushed a fast injection of the anesthetic into his system. The propofol concentration may have instantly stopped his heart, a defense expert testified.

Permissions

Read Comments

View reader comments | Comment on this story