Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search


Strauss-Kahn case: why prosecutors want to drop all charges

The district attorney's office told the accuser of Dominique Strauss-Kahn Monday that she had lied too many times in the past. Prosecutors will seek to drop the case Tuesday.

(Page 2 of 2)



Strauss-Kahn never denied he had a sexual encounter with the maid, but he claimed the sex was consensual. In a statement Monday, his lawyers, William Taylor and Benjamin Brafman, said, “We have maintained from the beginning of this case that our client is innocent. We also maintained that there were many reasons to believe that Mr. Strauss-Kahn’s accuser was not credible.”

Skip to next paragraph

In a letter to Strauss-Kahn’s defense lawyers, the district attorney’s office said the accuser lied on an asylum application about a gang-rape that she said took place in Guinea, lied about what she did immediately after the alleged attack, and has been cheating on her income taxes for the past two years.

“Finally, during the course of this investigation, the complainant was untruthful with assistant district attorneys about a variety of additional topics concerning her history, background, present circumstances and personal relationships,” wrote the assistant district attorney, Joan Illuzzi-Orbon, in the letter.

On May 14, the accuser, an immigrant from Guinea, claimed Strauss-Kahn emerged from his bathroom without any clothes on and assaulted her, forcing her to perform an oral sex act. According to the district attorney’s office, the forensic evidence seemed to indicate some sexual act took place.

“It sounds like the forensic evidence was consistent with her story,” says Alan Kaufman, a former federal prosecutor and a partner in Kelley Drye & Warren’s white collar defense practice group in New York. “On the other hand, if the district attorney’s office went forward, they would have to bring out all the falsehoods and omissions that occurred during the pretrial process, and they would have had a very tough road ahead.”

The reason the district attorney’s office would have wanted to introduce the falsehoods to a jury would be try to get out in front of the defense, says Mr. Kaufman, who says prosecutors can usually deal with a few inconsistencies but “the volume of them must have been unusual.”

Over the past several weeks, the case took on political ramifications with many African-American officials calling on Vance to move ahead with the prosecution. They tried to frame it as an example of a poor black woman being victimized by a rich white man.

However, Kaufman says he thinks Vance “would bend over backwards to show he was not favoring the privileged white man at the expense of the third-world woman.”

Professor McAvoy, however, thinks Vance may have moved too fast and aggressively against Strauss-Kahn. “He was the head of the IMF and very influential in how issues were handled,” she says. “Now, there is a woman there who is handling things differently so this case may have changed the course of history.”

In fact, Strauss-Kahn was a leading contender to be the next president of France. “That’s now unlikely,” says McAvoy. “The bottom line is that everyone is looking bad.”

Permissions

Read Comments

View reader comments | Comment on this story