US unveils Arctic strategy, but is it keeping pace with other countries?
The National Strategy for the Arctic Region focuses on security, environment, and international cooperation. But with retreating sea ice creating opportunity as well as potential conflict, the US is seen as lagging.
(Page 2 of 2)
The Northwest Passage, which snakes through the Canadian archipelago and along the coast of Alaska, opened in 2007, when the extent of summer sea ice hit a record low. That record was eclipsed during last summer's melt season.Skip to next paragraph
In Pictures Arctic Ice
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
The changes are raising the issue of rights of passage for shipping – whether countries like Russia and Canada can treat these passages as territorial waters, or whether they represent international waterways.
As more of the ocean has been exposed during the summers, the US and other countries have been mapping the sea bottom in great detail to back up claims of jurisdiction over potential oil, gas, and mineral reserves and deposits. By some estimates the region contains 13 percent of the planet's undiscovered oil and 30 percent of its undiscovered natural gas.
At the same time, however, the challenges of operating in the region are enormous and expensive to overcome because of the region's harsh climate. Building up an infrastructure to support oil and gas development, stationing Navy and Coast Guard ships for national defense or for quick responses to shipping accidents or oil spills, and supporting the population growth expected to accompany increasing activity at the top of the world are expensive propositions.
The US is about a decade behind other Arctic nations in upgrading its fleet of icebreakers, notes Heather Conley, a policy specialist who focuses on Arctic issues at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.
Today's announcement represents an affirmation of past policies rather than a strategy, she says.
“It's a great exercise to reaffirm Arctic policy,” she says. “But we really need to provide a lot more specifics – and budgets. If we want to evolve Arctic infrastructure, that means serious budget resources.”
The document the administration released Friday doesn't say much about that.
“That's the disconnect between a statement of reaffirmation and implementing those to making them come to fruition and holding agencies accountable,” she says.
Before one can even talk dollars and cents, she adds, the US needs a vision for what it wants to do.
“How much do you want to develop? Do you want to have full-bore economic development in the Arctic, or do you really want to preserve and protect? You have to figure that out and figure out the infrastructure plan around that, then put real resources to that,” she says.
And while the strategy emphasized working cooperatively with other Arctic nations, she notes that the US is the only Arctic country that doesn't have a high-ranking diplomat to focus on Arctic issues, she explains.
These and other challenges await the implementation of the strategy. The senior official noted that more-specific directives will be appearing over time, including an effort to assign responsibilities to some 20 federal agencies whose activities currently touch on Arctic issues and activities.