- Amnesty International report brands Libya's militias 'out of control'
- Obama proposes bringing jobs home from overseas. Would his plan work?
- Obama's NASA budget: Mars takes a hit, but space science isn't dead
- Payroll tax deal close: Why did Republicans back down? (+video)
- Israel says Bangkok, Delhi, and Tbilisi attacks all linked – to Iran
- Rick Santorum's new machine-gun ad: Will it work? (+video)
- Honduras prison fire kills more than 300, highlights regional problem (+video)
- Angry Birds joins Facebook in bid to reach 800 million users
This round, Pentagon may keep General Petraeus offstage
As his next report on troop levels nears, senior officers aren't sure they'll agree.
(Page 2 of 2)
With greater stability in Iraq and louder calls for more forces in Afghanistan, there is a growing feeling that Iraq must be seen as part of a larger puzzle of challenges.
Skip to next paragraphThere are currently 15 combat brigades in Iraq after the final "surge brigade" left in July, and a total of about 146,000 soldiers serving there right now.
Violence has plummeted since last year, although August saw a slight uptick in the number of American combat fatalities from a historical low in July.
Petraeus' assessment will include not only the level of violence but also the strength of Al Qaeda and other militia groups, political progress within the government of Iraq, and the growth of Iraq security forces, defense officials say.
"Factors outside Iraq – such as the strain on the force and the situation in Afghanistan – are also considered. However, they inform but do not drive the recommendations of MNF-I [Multi-national Forces Iraq]," says a senior military officer close to the process.
More troops for Afghanistan
Meanwhile, Petraeus's thinking on Afghanistan may begin to change soon. Next month, he is slated to take over as the head of US Central Command, Tampa, Fla., which oversees war operations for both Iraq and Afghanistan.
Petraeus is said to be still "developing" his views on the broader view of war operations he will assume in his new job.
"[T]hey say where you stand depends on where you sit, and so I'll be interested to have that conversation with him later on when he's responsible for both places," said Conway last week.
There is still much debate about what the broader strategy in Afghanistan should be and to what degree the new American strategy there should be made up of non-military entities.
Either way, it seems likely more troops will be sent there. Secretary Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, support sending at least three brigades to Afghanistan, pending Petraeus's view on how many more forces can be drawn from Iraq.
Politics and the military
But there is another reason to keep Petraeus out of the political limelight. With intense pressure to use the military as pawns that suit one or another political view, top military officers have for the last year railed against suggestions that the military play any political role during an intense election year in which the war in Iraq still figures prominently.
Admiral Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the senior uniformed officer at the Pentagon, has long criticisized the politicization of the military.
"We are an apolitical, neutral organization in this country, and we need to stay out of politics, those of us in uniform," Mullen told reporters last week at the Pentagon.
"And it is very tempting in this time because of where we are, and we just shouldn't do it."


Previous






Become part of the Monitor community
36K on Facebook | 12K on Twitter | 2,250 on YouTube