Santorum on Satan: Who leaked the speech to the press?

We think it’s important here to follow one of the cardinal questions of politics – who benefits? That would narrow the field down to Rick Santorum’s GOP opponents.

|
Joshua Lott/REUTERS
Republican presidential candidate and former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum addresses the Maricopa County Lincoln Day Luncheon in Phoenix, Ariz., Tuesday.

Who leaked Rick Santorum’s Satan speech to the press? Perhaps a better way to put it would be who steered the Drudge Report to Santorum’s 2008 remarks at Ave Maria University in Florida that America is under assault by Satan? After all, those comments had existed, waiting to be discovered for years, before Drudge plastered them all over the top of his website for much of Feb. 21.

Rush Limbaugh blamed generic “leftists,” but we don’t think it came from Democrats. President Obama’s campaign team still appears to believe that Mitt Romney would be the most formidable GOP candidate, so they might not want to weaken Mr. Santorum. If they do worry about Santorum – and there’s some evidence he might be the stronger GOP candidate in Midwest swing states – they’d save the Satan card to play in the general election.

No, we think it’s important here to follow one of the cardinal questions of politics – who benefits? That would narrow the field down to Santorum’s GOP opponents. And of those, only one has the money to devote to opposition research, and a relationship with the Drudge operation. Let’s just say that person’s initials are “Mitt Romney.”

We don’t have any specific evidence here, it’s important to say that. But we’re only repeating what many in the GOP itself are saying this morning. In late January the New York Times reported that Mr. Romney’s campaign manager Matt Rhoades had “close ties” to Drudge. Since then the influential site has featured a string of pro-Romney stories.

“I ... think that this is a Romney-leaked piece,” wrote conservative editor Erick Erickson today on the RedState blog.

Mr. Erickson, by the way, defends Santorum, saying that he (Erickson) agrees with the Satan remarks. In the 2008 speech, Santorum asserted that Satan had taken over US academia, culture, politics, and mainstream Protestantism, which he said was “in shambles.”

“His statement is well within the mainstream of orthodox Christian theology,” writes Erickson.

Other conservatives aren’t so sure. Jennifer Rubin, writing on her Right Turn Washington Post blog, says that the Satan statements are not remotely commonplace social conservative views, and that conservatives will be the group most hurt by them.

“He threatens to discredit them and cement stereotypes that they are judgmental and extreme in their views,” Ms. Rubin writes.

We should note here that Rubin has written supportively of Romney in the recent past. Overt Romney surrogates such as Gov. Chris Christie (R) of New Jersey have not shied away from the topic, either.

On Feb. 22 Governor Christie told George Stephanopoulos on Good Morning America that Santorum is wrong, and his statements are relevant to his fitness to be commander-in-chief.

“It is by definition relevant ... I think people want to make an evaluation, a complete evaluation of anyone who asks to sit in the Oval Office,” Christie said.

GOP gray eminence Karl Rove on Fox News Tuesday night noted that Santorum’s words might help him in the primary but would be “hurtful in a general election,” particularly his assertion that mainstream Lutherans, Presbyterians, and Methodists are now subject to Satan’s power.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Santorum on Satan: Who leaked the speech to the press?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/Vox-News/2012/0222/Santorum-on-Satan-Who-leaked-the-speech-to-the-press
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe