N.Y. changed Common Core tests: Will it satisfy the opt-out movement?

Last year, 1 in every 5 New York students skipped the exams in protest. As another round of tests approach the state's education department says it has addressed concerns.

|
Carolyn Thompson/AP/File
Students hold signs in favor of opting out of state assessments during a visit by New York Education Commissioner MaryEllen Elia to the William Street School in Lancaster, N.Y. New York last year saw the highest rate of opt-outs in the country as parents protested the volume of testing and the high-stakes consequences.

One year after 20 percent of New York students refused to take state-mandated Common Core exams, the state's education commissioner has been trying to convince students, teachers, and parents that this round of testing is different.

Last year the state saw the highest rate of opt-outs in the country – 1 in 5 students refused to participate – as parents protested the amount of testing required by federal law, contending that the tests are excessively stressful and don't depict an accurate representation of students performance. The National Center for Fair and Open Testing estimated that more than 640,000 students in more than a dozen states opted out of the exams, with New York alone accounting for 240,000 opt-outs.

MaryEllen Elia, the state education commissioner, announced that one of the biggest changes would be abandoning the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers' performances. The state has placed a four-year moratorium on the practice, while it works on new methods to evaluate both students and teachers. The state also has shortened both English assessments that will be conducted over three days this week, and the math assessments that will be administered April 13-15. At least one reading passage and math word problem have been removed, the commissioner said.

"Some people, when they get the information, may change their mind. Some people may not," said Ms. Elia, who took over the education department in July. "I'm accepting the fact that the most important thing we can do right now is provide information on the major changes that I think have been made and work to really get the trust back from parents and teachers and administrators across the state."

In January, the New York State Education Department announced that third- through eighth-grade students will no longer be timed during testing, drawing criticism from some school officials who have framed the practice of timing as necessary for evaluating students performance.

"I don't even know how you administer a test like that," Eva Moskowitz, founder of the Success Academy network of charter schools, whose schools have been praised for their high test scores, told The New York Times. She defended the assessements as a way "to determine what a student knows and is able to do" in a reasonable amount of time.

But proponents of the state's opt-out movement aren't convinced that the changes are enough to address their concerns, and hoping that more participants will join their opposition to the tests.

"As a mom and as a teacher, I can say at this point that until I know more, my kids will not be taking the state assessments," Christine Gust, a parent and teacher, who wanted to know how state assessments would influence teacher evaluations once the moratorium ended, told the Associated Press.

This report contains.materials from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to N.Y. changed Common Core tests: Will it satisfy the opt-out movement?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Education/2016/0405/N.Y.-changed-Common-Core-tests-Will-it-satisfy-the-opt-out-movement
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe