Can House conservatives remove Boehner as Speaker? Not likely.

No House Speaker has ever been removed from office mid-Congress. One reason is that Speakers have the right to choose who will be recognized to make a motion from the floor. Without that recognition, a bid to remove a Speaker goes nowhere. 

|
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
House Speaker John Boehner (R) of Ohio responds to reporters about the problems in passing the Homeland Security budget because of Republican efforts to block President Barack Obama's executive actions on immigration, on Feb. 26, 2015. Many GOP conservatives are unhappy with Boehner's leadership on this issue, but a bid to remove him as Speaker faces formidable procedural hurdles, which accounts for why it has never been done.

As rumors swirl and fade about John Boehner’s removal from the speakership, it’s a good time to clarify a few things about House process and its history.

No speaker has ever been removed from office mid-Congress. If members want to remove a speaker from office, they would need to make a motion to declare the chair vacant. That motion has never succeeded.

That includes Speaker Cannon (R) of Illinois. Several news outlets have said the motion to remove the speaker was invoked against Cannon. That’s not accurate. Cannon’s “overthrow” did not remove him from office. Rather, he was “overthrown” because his power as Speaker was significantly curtailed. In addition to being Speaker, Cannon was the chair of the Rules Committee and was also responsible for assigning all members and chairs to each standing committee of the House. Both of these tools gave him exceptional power to control House business. On March 17, Rep. George Norris (R) of Nebraska offered a simple resolution to strip both powers from Speaker Cannon on a week that many of Cannon’s allies were missing from Congress, largely due to St. Patrick’s Day.

After the resolution passed two days later, Cannon, to the surprise of practically everybody in the chamber, entertained a motion to declare the office the Speaker vacant. That motion failed. In other words, Republicans did not want to remove Cannon from office. They just didn’t want him exercising as much power as he had during his tenure.

The surprising part of this story is not that Cannon was not removed. The surprise was that Cannon entertained a motion that could remove him from office at all. House rules lean heavily in the Speaker’s favor. This is why Boehner will likely remain Speaker in the 114th unless he voluntarily steps down.

Speakers have the right of recognition. They choose who will be recognized to make a motion from the members on the floor. Without the Speaker’s recognition, members can’t do much of anything. Speakers can also actively ignore members they do not want to make a motion. If the Speaker does not like the reason the member has sought recognition, he or she can simply refuse to recognize them. Without recognition, even a privileged motion goes nowhere. This makes removing the Speaker through the motion to declare the office vacant highly unlikely because the Speaker or his designee would have to allow the motion to be put before the House in the first place.

Procedurally, the more likely scenarios would involve intense collusion between Republicans and Democrats over the course of several votes. While it’s possible, I don’t believe Pelosi, Democrats, or the faction that wants a new Speaker are willing to go to those lengths. Though if it did happen, you’d be watching one of the more exception episodes in House history.

Joshua Huder publishes his Rule 22 blog at http://rule22.wordpress.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Can House conservatives remove Boehner as Speaker? Not likely.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Politics-Voices/2015/0302/Can-House-conservatives-remove-Boehner-as-Speaker-Not-likely
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe