Why Eric Cantor is stepping down early

Eric Cantor's early retirement came as almost as much of a surprise as the former majority leader's stunning upset in this year's GOP primary. But there are advantages to leaving early.

|
Jonathan Ernst/Reuters/File
US House majority leader Eric Cantor pauses while discussing his defeat in his Virginia Republican primary election during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington on June 11, 2014. On Thursday, Cantor said he will resign his seat effective Aug. 18, months earlier than expected.

Eric Cantor drew No. 1 in the freshman lottery on his first day in the House in 2001, and he's been at the front of the line ever since – that is, until he lost to economics professor Dave Brat in one of the most implausible primary upsets in House history. He resigned his seat on Thursday, another surprise.

Mr. Cantor, a prodigious fundraiser, had a storied House career. By the end of his freshman term, he had a seat at the GOP leadership table as chief deputy whip. He became majority leader in 2011. His relations with Speaker John Boehner (R) of Ohio, often measured in terms of clashes between aides on both sides, were seen as barometer on Capitol Hill, because somehow it seemed inevitable that Cantor would become speaker, perhaps even leading a coup from the right.

Instead, the coup from the right was aimed at him.

Cantor kept a low profile after his stunning June 10 loss. He resigned as majority leader, rarely attending leadership strategy sessions and generally making way for Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R) of California, a friend, to get established as new majority leader. The stately office space, the ubiquitous entourage of staff and security were gone.

Still, Cantor's announcement of plans to retire on Aug. 18 took the GOP caucus by surprise. As a parting shot, he called on Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) to call a special election for Nov. 4 to ensure that "constituents have a clear and strong voice during the consequential lame-duck session of Congress," he said in a column announcing his retirement in the Richmond Times-Dispatch

"The issues that will be considered during the lame-duck session this year will be crucial to the future of our country. These debates will continue into the new Congress, and the people of this district deserve to have their new voice representing them and engaging on their behalf," he added.

Typically, a new member of Congress takes office the first week in January. Rebranding the race for Virginia's Seventh District on Nov. 4 as a special election means that the winner takes office immediately after the vote and participates in any lame-duck session of Congress, which typically wraps up spending bills for the fiscal year beginning Oct. 1 and other issues deemed too difficult or politically toxic to take up just before an election.

That "special election" advantage also gives the winner a head start on the tenure clock that affect outcomes ranging from committee standing to choice of office space throughout a member's legislative career. (In effect, Cantor could be handing his successor the No. 1 pick in next year's freshman office lottery.)

But an early exit from Congress also gives Cantor a head start on the one-year "cooling-off period" that limits how early former members of Congress can lobby former colleagues on Capitol Hill.

Within hours of Cantor's defeat, speculation churned on whether Cantor would opt for a K Street lobby firm or a Wall Street hedge fund or investment bank. Either way, with fresh contacts in Washington – and, likely, Republicans still in control of the House – Cantor starts out with an edge in both worlds. He has not spoken publicly of his plans.

“There are two famous streets in America that would be glad to employ him. Either Wall Street or K Street would pay him a pretty good chunk of change," Ivan Adler of McCormick Group in Washington told Politico.

"Fortunately for the former House majority leader, one truth remains self-evident in Washington: No matter how soundly you've been walloped by voters, 'opportunities in the private sector' await, writes Mark Leibovich in the New York Times Magazine last month.

Of course, Cantor's early-retirement scenario still leaves his district unrepresented through Nov. 3, including those critical five weeks in August when members often come face-to-face with constituents in town meetings, as they did in August 2010, when protests over health-care reform legislation launched the tea party movement.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why Eric Cantor is stepping down early
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Decoder/2014/0803/Why-Eric-Cantor-is-stepping-down-early
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe