Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search


Decoder Buzz

Sandra Fluke running for Congress. What will Rush Limbaugh say? (+video)

Sandra Fluke, the women's rights activist whom Rush Limbaugh derided in 2012, has filed with the California Party seeking its endorsement for the race to succeed retiring Rep. Henry Waxman.

By Staff writer / February 4, 2014

Women's rights activist Sandra Fluke addresses the second session of the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina, Sept. 5, 2012. Fluke wants to succeed retiring Rep. Henry Waxman (D) of California.

Jim Young/Reuters

Enlarge

Sandra Fluke wants to succeed retiring Rep. Henry Waxman (D) of California. The women’s rights activist and former Georgetown Law student, whom Rush Limbaugh called a “slut” on his radio show in 2012, has filed with the state Democratic Party seeking its endorsement for the upcoming race.

Skip to next paragraph

Washington Editor

Peter Grier is The Christian Science Monitor's Washington editor. In this capacity, he helps direct coverage for the paper on most news events in the nation's capital.

Recent posts

Democratic congresswoman Carolyn Maloney said she welcomes a proposed congressional run by birth control advocate Sandra Fluke, urging her to 'Run, Sandra, run!'

She hasn’t officially announced her effort or filed papers with the Federal Election Commission, according to The Washington Post’s Aaron Blake, who broke the Fluke news.

“But filing for the state party’s endorsement means she’s officially part of the process,” Mr. Blake writes.

Ms. Fluke came to national prominence after testifying before a House Democratic panel two years ago, pushing for health insurers to include contraception coverage as part of the Affordable Care Act, also known as “Obamacare."

At the time, lawmakers were looking at the ACA clause that allows religious institutions to opt out of including contraception in their health plans if they wish. Fluke talked about her experience as a student at Georgetown, a Catholic university that did not include birth control in its health coverage.

This exclusion caused “financial, emotional, and medical burdens” for female students at Georgetown, Fluke told Democrats after Republicans denied her bid to testify before a full House committee.

Shortly thereafter on his show, Mr. Limbaugh said of Fluke’s assertion, “It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute.”

Uproar followed, with some top Republicans disowning Limbaugh’s choice of words. The radio host eventually apologized, but Fluke became a hero to many on the left.

This controversy may have made Fluke famous, but it does not ensure she’ll inherit Representative Waxman’s seat. The list of well-known Democrats and independents eager for a chance to win the coastal L.A. district is long and getting longer. California’s jungle primary system, in which the top two vote-getters move to the general election regardless of their party affiliation, complicates all the contenders’ electoral strategies.

Fluke’s no carpetbagger: She moved to California following law school and passed the state bar exam two years ago. Other Democrats who have announced their intention to run include former Los Angeles controller and mayoral candidate Wendy Greuel, and state Sen. Ted Lieu, whose district largely overlaps Waxman’s.

Democrats who have said they might run include Debra Bowen, California secretary of State; and California Assemblymember Richard Bloom.

Independent Marianne Williamson, a self-help guide author, had already jumped into the race, running to Waxman’s left. TV producer Brent Roske is another independent candidate. The big question is whether ex-Republican and current independent Bill Bloomfield will run. Mr. Bloomfield, a wealthy and successful businessman, plowed $7 million of his own cash into running against Waxman in 2012. He won 46 percent of the vote – a strong showing against a legendary 40-year incumbent.

“It’s going to be a cast of thousands,” Democratic strategist Garry South told Los Angeles Times reporters Seema Mehta and Jean Merl last week.

The 33rd District itself leans Democratic, but it's not as liberal as it used to be. Bloomfield did well in 2012 in part because redistricting carved much of Waxman’s liberal Los Angeles base out of the district, replacing it with heavily Republican Palos Verdes Peninsula to the south, points out election expert Charlie Cook in his Cook Political Report analysis of the 33rd.

That means Fluke’s liberal bona fides might not be enough to power her to victory.

Meantime, her nascent candidacy is sparking predictable partisan reactions. On the right, many conservatives are making some variation of the same joke.

“I see Sandra Fluke is planning a campaign for Congress. I presume she’ll want us to pay for that, too?” tweeted Sean Davis, co-founder of the conservative-leaning website The Federalist.

Meanwhile, the media are eagerly awaiting a comment on the candidacy from a certain well-known radio host.

“Sandra Fluke officially files to give Rush Limbaugh countless hours of material,” tweeted Slate’s Dave Weigel.

Permissions

  • Weekly review of global news and ideas
  • Balanced, insightful and trustworthy
  • Subscribe in print or digital

Special Offer

 
Become a fan! Follow us! Google+ YouTube See our feeds!