Elizabeth Warren memoir: 5 things we learned about liberal hero

Liberal darling Elizabeth Warren, freshman Democratic US senator from Massachusetts, released her memoir April 22, 'A Fighting Chance.' Here are five things to know about the book.

2. Warren explains her native American heritage

Steven Senne/AP
Elizabeth Warren, then a candidate for US Senate, faces reporters during a news conference in Braintree, Mass., in 2012. She responded to questions from reporters about her native American heritage.

In 2012, her Senate campaign almost came unhinged over her fumbling response to questions about her native American background. An old article in the newspaper at Harvard University, where she was a law professor, had quoted a university spokesman defending faculty diversity by citing Warren’s heritage, and she was accused of getting her job under false pretenses. Republicans demanded she prove who her ancestors were.

“As a kid, I had learned about my Native American background the same way every kid learns about who they are: from family,” she writes. “I never questioned my family’s stories or asked my parents for proof or documentation.”

She writes that her mother’s family lived in Indian Territory that had become part of the new state of Oklahoma by the time her mother, Polly, was born. Both of her mother’s parents had native American ancestry, she says. The Boston Globe eventually did an investigative article into Warren’s family history, and tracked down distant relatives who also spoke of the family’s native American background.

Warren also says she never sought advantage from her background: “I never asked for special treatment when I applied to college, to law school, or for jobs.”

2 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.