Debt limit: Link any increase to spending cuts? Majority in poll says yes.

The results of the Monitor/TIPP poll – some 75 percent of respondents said the debt limit and spending should be linked – mesh with other surveys that cite rising concerns about deficits.

|
Alex Brandon/AP/File
The US flag flies next to the Capitol in Washington. This desire for spending restraint is widespread, according to a new Christian Science Monitor/TIPP poll released Monday, as Congress and President Obama have been wrestling with what to do about two fiscal deadlines.

Americans have a message for the politicians now weighing the nation’s fiscal future: Don’t take on more debt without cutting federal spending.

This desire for spending restraint is widespread, according to a new Christian Science Monitor/TIPP poll released Monday.

Some 75 percent of Americans agreed with a statement offered in the poll: “Any increase in the nation's debt limit must be tied to spending cuts.” Only 21 percent disagreed.

Although one question in one poll isn’t a complete guide to public opinion, the new poll meshes with other surveys that have found rising concern about federal deficits – a concern that appears to be partly based on worries that rising federal debt will harm the economy.

The poll is being released as Congress and President Obama have been wrestling with what to do about two fiscal deadlines: First, America has reached its official debt limit, meaning Congress must raise the limit before the Treasury can borrow more to help pay the nations bills. Second, at the start of March, unless some other plan is agreed upon, a so-called “sequester” will go into effect, prompting automatic spending cuts to be imposed on a large swathe of the federal budget.

Republicans have agreed to de-link the two issues, at least for a time, by allowing the Treasury to borrow more money through May. But conservative lawmakers promise to battle for significant spending cuts in talks over the sequester issue.

In the new Monitor/TIPP poll, respondents who identify as Republicans show greater concern about the size of federal spending.

About 85 percent of Republicans strongly agreed with the statement “The government spends too much money,” compared with 44 percent of Democrats. But 77 percent of Democrats did agree with that statement to some degree (either “strongly” or “somewhat,” as measured by the poll.)

Similarly, about 63 percent of Democrats and 89 percent of Republicans agreed, either strongly or somewhat, with the idea of tying a debt-limit increase to spending cuts.

Majority support for this view is found among women as well as men, black as well as white, and old as well as young.

A challenge, of course, is how to cut spending.

The new poll didn’t test that question in detail, but both this survey and others have found Americans reluctant to see significant benefit cuts in programs such as Social Security and Medicare, which make up a large share of federal spending.

In the Monitor/TIPP poll, for example, a majority of respondents rejected the idea of raising the retirement age for Social Security benefits (although 4 in 10 supported the idea).

Some 7 in 10 would agree to see Social Security benefits trimmed for wealthier recipients.

Similarly, many Americans are reluctant to see big cuts in health-care programs including Medicare.

In a December ABC News/Washington Post poll, two-thirds of respondents rebuffed the idea of curbs on Medicaid, the federal/state program to provide health insurance for the poor.

In 2011, according to White House statistics, about 43 percent of federal spending was on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid or other health programs.

Another 16 percent went toward “income security” programs such as food stamps and unemployment insurance, while more than 6 percent went toward interest on the national debt. About 20 percent of spending was on national defense – a number set to edge down as operations in Afghanistan wind down.

And 3.5 percent is spent on veterans benefits.

In the long run, controlling federal spending will mean grappling with some of those big-ticket items in the federal budget.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Debt limit: Link any increase to spending cuts? Majority in poll says yes.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/DC-Decoder/2013/0204/Debt-limit-Link-any-increase-to-spending-cuts-Majority-in-poll-says-yes
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe