Mitt Romney's five biggest liabilities as GOP nominee

Typically, an election with an incumbent president on the ballot is a referendum on him. But President Obama is trying to turn the tables. So what exactly does Mitt Romney bring to the table, in both positive and negative ways? Here are the liabilities:

2. Awkward image as an out-of-touch rich guy

Rebecca Cook/REUTERS/File
Mitt Romney prepares to make is ill-fated 'two Cadillacs' comment at Ford Field in Detroit Feb. 24.

Starting with his perfectly coiffed hair, Romney looks like a president. But he can be plastic and forced on the stump. “I like cars,” he blurts out sometimes, leaving audience members scratching their heads. “The trees are the right height,” he said in Michigan, trying to show his love for his native state.

Some friends, who feel his pain, say he can appear awkward because he’s trying too hard, and he’s not comfortable speaking about two things that are central in his life: his wealth and his faith.

Whatever the reason, his less-than-charismatic delivery is a problem. And at this point, he has made enough wealth-related gaffes to fill a catalogue. Some of them aren’t fair – like the time he said he “likes to fire people.” What he really said was that he “likes to fire people,” like a health-care provider, when he’s unhappy with their service, not that he likes to fire employees.

But he’s made so many unfortunate comments – like mentioning that his wife, Ann, has two Cadillacs – that he enters the general election contest with a firm reputation as an out-of-touch rich guy.

Surveys show Romney faces a gaping deficit against Obama on likability and relatability. Only 29 percent of Americans have a favorable view of Romney, versus 42 percent who see Obama favorably, according to a New York Times/CBS News poll issued April 18. On the question, “Do you think the candidate is someone you can relate to?” Romney scored 34 percent and Obama scored 47 percent.

In the end, the election will hinge more on the economy than on likeability, and so Romney still has even shot at being elected. But if he could improve his image, his chances would be greater.

2 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.