Chattanooga crash: Should school buses have seat belts?

For many places, the cost of outfitting school buses with seat belts is prohibitively expensive. But some advocates say that no cost is too high to save a child's life.

|
(AP Photo/Mark Humphrey)
Flowers, signs and stuffed animals make up a makeshift memorial outside Woodmore Elementary School on Tuesday, Nov. 22, 2016, in Chattanooga, Tenn. The school bus driven by Johnthony Walker, 24, crashed while transporting children home from the school Monday, killing at least five students. Walker was arrested Monday and charged with five counts of vehicular homicide including reckless driving and reckless endangerment, police said.

The debate over whether school buses should be equipped with seat belts was reignited after a deadly bus crash in Chattanooga, Tennessee.

The Monday crash, which killed five children and sent several more to the hospital, has some asking whether more would have been saved if the bus had been equipped with seat belts. There is no federal requirement for school buses to come equipped with such devices, and even in some states that do have them, it is sometimes left up to the individual school districts to require their implementation.

Fatalities on school buses are rare, due to the size, design, and weight of the yellow behemoths. While crashes do happen, deaths resulting from those crashes are unusual, even on buses with no safety belt. For many districts, the cost of updating buses with seat belts is prohibitively expensive. But for a grieving parent, no cost is too high to save even a small number of children.

"Installing seat belts on buses is not free, and requiring their installation might mean reducing funding on other critical safety aspects, such as crossing guards for those children who do walk to school," Richard Williams, former director of the regulatory studies program at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, told CNN. "But this is a decision each community must make for their own children. There are very, very few deaths of children from school bus accidents, and there may be other expenditures that will be better investments to reduce risk."

Even without seat belts, school buses are considered one of the safest modes of transportation in the United States. They are large and highly visible to other drivers, and their size means they can take a fairly substantial collision without gravely harming its passengers. Buses' interiors are designed to surround the children with padding and have an excellent track record of keeping them safe, as the Christian Science Monitor's Beatrice Gitau explained last year:

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tout school buses as the safest method for transporting students to and from school. In fact, the NHTSA says that American students are nearly eight times safer riding in a school bus than with their own parents and guardians in cars.

According to NHTSA data, "from 2004 to 2013 there were 327 school-age children who died in school-transportation-related crashes; 54 were occupants of school transportation vehicles, 147 were occupants of other vehicles, 116 were pedestrians, 9 were pedal cyclists, and 1 was other nonoccupant."

Opponents argue that even that small number of fatalities could and should be further brought down by seat belts. CNN cites a similar crash, in Anaheim, Calif., to the one in Chattanooga. In the Anaheim crash, most of the conditions of the collision were the same, but there were no fatalities, likely due to the California bus being equipped with seat belts, while the Chattanooga bus was not.

There have been arguments by some opponents of seat belts in buses that in an emergency, panicking children might become trapped under the safety belts, though that would be the case for a collision in a normal vehicle as well. In addition, most children have been trained from a young age how to use seat belts and are usually comfortable with them.

Government agencies have estimated the cost of retrofitting school buses with seat belts at anywhere from $7,000 to $10,000 per bus. In smaller communities and poorer school district, that cost adds up, especially as buses without seat belts often squash in three students to a seat. In order to accommodate all students in a two-per-seat, seat belt arrangement, some school districts might have to purchase another bus, further adding to the expense, for what is already considered to be one of the safest methods of travel. 

But for advocates of seat belts, any cost is surmountable for the safety of children.

"I don't deny that this is a challenge," National Highway Traffic Safety Administrator Mark Rosekind said, calling for a three-point seat belt on every bus in November 2015. "But I want us to concentrate on this simple basic statement: School buses should have seat belts. Period. It should be utterly uncontroversial – there is no question that seat belts offer improved safety."

This article contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Chattanooga crash: Should school buses have seat belts?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2016/1123/Chattanooga-crash-Should-school-buses-have-seat-belts
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe