Skip to footer

Leaders of both parties line up to support Iran nuclear deal

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell and Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who leads the DNC, are among the high-profile political leaders who have now given their support to the White House's proposed nuclear agreement with Iran.

|
AP Photo/Joel Auerbach
Democratic National Committee Chairwoman, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., left, looks on as Vice President Joe Biden discusses the Iran nuclear deal with Jewish community leaders at the David Posnack Jewish Community Center in Davie, Fla. on Thursday, Sept. 3, 2015. Exploring a presidential campaign, Biden offered a robust defense of a nuclear accord with Iran strongly backed by the White House in the latest sign of his work to present himself as a natural heir to President Barack Obama.
  • By Matthew Daly Associated Press

| Washington

Already a done deal in Congress, the Iran nuclear agreement gained more momentum Sunday as former Secretary of State Colin Powell and Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the head of the Democratic National Committee, announcement their support.

Powell, secretary of state under President George W. Bush, called the agreement "a pretty good deal" that would reduce the threat of Iran gaining a nuclear weapon.

Iran's nuclear program "has been thrown into a detour" making it less likely it can produce a nuclear weapon to be used against Israel or other countries, Powell said. "So that's pretty good," he told NBC's "Meet the Press."

Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., said the decision to endorse the agreement was the most difficult one she has made in nearly 23 years in elected office.

The Jewish lawmaker wrote in The Miami Herald that while she has concerns about the agreement, the deal "provides the best chance to ensure" security for the U.S., Israel and other allies.

"Under the agreement Iran will not be able to produce a nuclear bomb for at least 10-15 years," she said, while the U.S. and its allies "will be able to more closely concentrate on stopping Iran's terrorist activity."

The White House has clinched the necessary Senate votes to ensure that Congress will uphold the deal even if President Barack Obama ends up having to veto a disapproval resolution set for a vote in the week ahead.

But with that support in hand and more piling up, the White House and congressional backers of the deal have begun aiming for a more ambitious goal: enough commitments to bottle up the disapproval resolution in the Senate with a filibuster, preventing it from even coming to a final vote.

That effort suffered a setback on Friday as Sen. Ben Cardin of Maryland, top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said he opposed the deal.

Thirty-eight senators back the agreement, three votes shy of the 41 needed to filibuster a disapproval resolution and block it from passing.

Powell, who served as national security adviser under President Ronald Reagan, invoked Reagan's oft-quoted maxim that the West should "trust but verify" any agreements with the former Soviet Union.

"With Iranians, don't trust but always verify," Powell said.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Leaders of both parties line up to support Iran nuclear deal
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2015/0906/Leaders-of-both-parties-line-up-to-support-Iran-nuclear-deal
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe