Miss USA will air on REELZ cable network. Does anyone still care?

The Trump-owned beauty pageant, a long-running tradition that has been criticized for being antiquated and sexist, will be broadcast by the cable network REELZ after being dropped by NBC. Where do beauty pageants fit in today's society? 

|
Jamie Fine/Reuters/File
Donald Trump poses with former Miss Universe Beauty Queens (L-R) Susie Castillo of the U.S., Shandi Finnessey of the U.S., Amelia Vega of the Dominican Republic, Dayana Mendoza of Venezuela, and Justine Pasek of Panama during a pageant photo shoot in New York.

The Miss USA pageant has found a new home after being dropped by NBC earlier this week. 

The competition will air July 12 on the cable network REELZ, after NBC refused to broadcast the pageant due to inflammatory remarks about Mexican immigrants made by the pageant's co-owner, presidential candidate Donald Trump. But some are suggesting that Trump wasn't the only reason for NBC's exit from the pageant business. One unnamed source told Fox News that NBC "had been looking for a way out of airing the show for some time" due to low ratings and ad revenue.

The Miss USA pageant, which selects one winner to compete for Miss Universe, was created in 1952 to rival the Miss America pageant after Miss America 1950 refused to pose for publicity pictures in a swimsuit. Today, the two competitions are nearly identical in both structure and viewership: Miss USA 2014 brought in 5.55 million viewers, while 7.6 million tuned into Miss America. 

While both were among the most watched television events the nights of their airing, these numbers pale in comparison to viewership 50 years ago: In 1960, a whopping 85 million people tuned in to see Miss America get crowned. 

A variety of factors contribute to these numbers, of course – coinciding sports events, the capability to catch up online the next day, and the sheer number of channels available on cable, to name a few – but the decrease is still significant, especially as the 2015 Super Bowl's 114.4 million viewers remind us that live television is not yet dead. 

Pageants have long been criticized by feminists claiming they promote objectification, dating back to 1968 when women famously held a demonstration protesting Miss America. Many critics in those days argued that they rewarded women who were “unintelligent, inarticulate, and apolitical,” says Blain Roberts, author of "Pageants, Parlors, and Pretty Women: Race and Beauty in the Twentieth-Century South," in a New York Times opinion piece. This claim is more difficult to make today, she says, as “winners and contestants have attended Ivy League universities, earned professional degrees, and run for Congress.”

“Nevertheless, the feminists’ most incisive critique – that beauty contests exploit women, sexualize their bodies and encourage conformity to 'ludicrous' beauty standards – still resonates today,” she writes. “Although pageant officials and contestants emphasize scholarships, talents and platform issues and repackage the swimsuit competition as the ‘lifestyle and fitness’ category, their rhetoric rings hollow.” 

So will beauty pageants continue to have a place in a society growing increasingly sensitive to feminist issues? Laurie Gray and Nancy Redd, Miss Rhode Island and Miss Virginia respectively, seem to think so.

Ms. Gray and Ms. Redd, who competed in the 2003 Miss America pageant shortly after graduating from Harvard University, both identified as feminists and saw the pageant as an opportunity "to speak with political figures, civic leaders and the media to spread the word" about causes they cared about, Gray told a Baltimore Sun reporter.

Redd, who won the swimsuit portion of the pageant, has remained an outspoken proponent of beauty pageants. She says the most rewarding aspect was influencing young girls to follow in her footsteps as a high-achiever.

"Being affiliated with the Miss America brand gave me an incredible opportunity to offer youth a different perspective on life from a persona that they admired and respected," Redd, who majored in women's studies, writes in an article titled "There's Room for Feminists in the Miss America Pageant." "In the same way folks might buy Coca-Cola because it’s an official sponsor of American Idol, I believed that a large contingency of young women might be open to exploring feminism ‘cause Miss Virginia said so."

While some opponents argue that it shouldn't be necessary to strut around in a swimsuit and high heels to make a difference in the world, others are embracing the makeup and evening gowns. 

The rise of third-wave feminism, which encourages women to act and dress to whatever degree of femininity they feel comfortable with rather than suppressing their "girly" side, has led some women to view beauty pageants as empowering. Adrienne Vogt of Bustle says pageants celebrate women who are both beautiful and smart, and show young girls that the two traits aren't mutually exclusive. 

"It’s less that Miss America is sexist and more that it has a responsibility to bring itself into the modern age," Vogt writes. "Pageants are a powerful medium to reach a huge audience and also champion the success of excellent women in a world where 'being pretty' means you get talked down to or thought of as promiscuous or stupid."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Miss USA will air on REELZ cable network. Does anyone still care?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2015/0702/Miss-USA-will-air-on-REELZ-cable-network.-Does-anyone-still-care
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe