Is the cyberwarfare arms race for real? Survey of world experts says it is.
A majority of the word's top cybersecurity experts surveyed say a cyberwarfare arms race is in full swing. US readiness lags behind that of some smaller countries, the survey found.
(Page 2 of 2)
David Marcus, director of advance research and threat intelligence at McAfee Labs says it was necessary this time for the company's annual global survey to focus on the world's drift toward offensive cybertechnologies.Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
“Everybody only discusses offensive cyber strategy via veiled references to the Russians and the Chinese without any strong, public, quantifiable proof,” he says in the survey report. “No one has stepped back and said, let's take the 30 or so countries we think have offensive cyber capabilities and grade what they are and how they differ.”
To try to do that, the survey rated countries with one-to-five stars, five stars being the highest level of cyberpreparedness – offensive and defensive. In that ranking, the US received four stars while Israel received 4.5 stars. China and Russia both received three stars – but survey respondents said both were formidable threats beyond their stars rank.
In its 2011 report, the office of the National Counterintelligence Executive for the US accused both China and Russia of persistent cyberespionage against America that represented “a persistent threat to US economic security.”
But Russian and Chinese experts say they are victims, too, and are united in trying to bring nations together to combat cyberthreats, from espionage to cyber weapons. Terrorism and social networking are considered major threats by both governments.
“We've been a target of terrorist attacks,” says Vladimire Chizhov, the Russian Federation's Ambassador to the EU told the survey, noting his country's longstanding call to develop an international agreement on cyberthreats. “This type of crime can only be successfully fought through international cooperation.”
But one nation’s cyberterrorist may be another nation's cyber freedom fighter. Which leaves the US and other Western nations warily edging into international discussions, leery about any agreement that would provide a rationale for regimes to clamp down on freedom of speech on the Internet. Yet the need for some international understanding to rein in the growing threat is acknowledged.
“In order to make a difference, all countries have to take responsibility for what's happening in their own infrastructure, and the only way to achieve that is through international organizations,” says Melissa Hathaway, a former adviser on cybersecurity issues to the Obama administration. “We have to agree in the G20, NATO, and the UN about what is acceptable.”
Get daily or weekly updates from CSMonitor.com delivered to your inbox. Sign up today.