Fukushima prepares for cold shutdown: Will it finally stabilize Unit 1?
At Fukushima Daiichi in Japan, nuclear reactor Unit 1 is being prepared for 'cold shutdown,' which requires flooding the reactor's containment structure with cold water to stop steam production.
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
If that happened, it would be a major shift from the nuclear plant's current status, which the International Atomic Energy Agency still lists as "very serious." Cold shutdown means bringing the temperature inside the reactor down below the boiling point of water, so no steam pressure is being produced – a significant step if it happens, US experts said.
Before the temperature can be reduced, the building must be vented of radioactive air to allow operators to approach the reactor. In addition, American and British scientists have expressed concerns about the proposed step and newly discovered evidence of an ongoing radiation leak into the Pacific Ocean.
Bringing Unit 1 to cold shutdown
But important questions remain about how safe the cold shutdown process will be. To bring down the temperature in Unit 1, the company plans to inject water into the primary containment structure – a large, light-bulb-shaped container that surrounds the inner reactor vessel that holds the uranium fuel core.
Will the primary containment structure be able to hold the many tons of water that will fill it – or will it leak or split because it is damaged? Will a new quake or aftershock damage a containment structure that is far heavier because it is full of water?
"They're basically getting ready to run a big experiment," says Edwin Lyman, a nuclear reactor expert with the Union of Concerned Scientists, a nuclear industry watchdog group that is closely monitoring the situation in Japan. "It sounds like they're assuming that the structural issues [with the primary containment structure] aren't that serious – and there's debate over that."
Even so, filling up the containment structure "seems like a reasonable thing to do if they can't cover the cores in any other way," Dr. Lyman adds. "They're just stuck with doing whatever is going to work. The problem is, they're learning by experimentation – not by some well-thought through contingency plan."
The operator of the Fukushima Daiichi plant – Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) – last week revised estimates of the amount of damage sustained by the fuel cores of Units 1-3. In that estimate, the company revised downward the amount of core damage in Unit 1 from 70 percent to 55 percent. At the same time, it bumped up the damage level estimates for Unit 2 from 30 to 35 percent and for Unit 3 from 25 to 30 percent.