Chile earthquake, Hawaii tsunami: Why this happens
The earthquake in Chile is a reminder of the lively geological activity under Earth's surface.
(Page 2 of 2)
Yet getting a better handle on the recurrence rate along any single section of the zone is tough, researchers say.Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
The most immediate predecessor to today’s quake appears to be a temblor that occurred in 1730, Dr. Atwater says. It’s documented in Spanish colonial records.
And a tsunami associated with the quake reached Japan and caused some damage.
But not long after, native Americans in that part of the continent drove the Spaniards out of the region, he says. So there’s precious little information on what might have happened during the intervening years.
“It’s an open question, how big an earthquake you can get on that part of the fault,” he says.
Subduction zones spawn the most powerful earthquakes
What is clear is that subduction zones in general are the spawning grounds for the most powerful earthquakes the planet can generate, researchers say. The reason has to do with the surface area involved in the rupture. The greater the surface area involved for a given amount of slip, the more powerful the quake.
Some plate boundaries appear largely as vertical faults that slide past each other, such as California’s San Andreas or Haiti’s Enriquillo-Plantain Garden Fault. Along these sorts of faults, hardscrabble rock extends straight down into the crust only so far before it’s heated and becomes a taffy-like fluid.
Crust sliding down through a subduction zone, by contrast, does so at a relatively shallow angle. The result: for a given length along which a rupture occurs, the surface area involved is larger for a subduction zone quake than for one involving a strike-slip fault.
For all that scientists are learning about these key features of the planet’s ever-migrating crust, subduction zones still yield nasty surprises – ones with a direct bearing on evaluations of the seismic and tsunami hazards people in a subduction region may face.
For instance, it’s become increasingly clear that earthquakes along strike-slip faults can trigger quakes along other segments of the same fault – or on faults far distant.
Research suggests that a magnitude 7.9 quake near Mt. Denali in Alaska in 2002 appears to have triggered an uptick in small earthquakes in California, Russo says.
But quakes along subduction zones? Up to 2004, he explains, most geophysicists held that once a segment of a subduction zone snapped, the show was over – at least for a couple of centuries while stress in the zone built up again. Quakes along one segment of a subduction zone weren’t noted for triggering a major quake nearby a short time later.
But that changed with the Sumatran earthquake in December 2004. Three months after that magnitude 8.9 quake, an 8.7 temblor struck a few hundred miles away from the epicenter of the December quake.
“Those two quakes made people sit up and take notice,” he says.