Office of the future, offices of the past

An article on the ‘office of the future’ prompts some research on the history of the word office.

|
Rick Wilking/Reuters
Danelle Hutton works on her laptop computer in her open cubicle at the U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Research Support Facility in Golden, Colorado in 2013.

Perhaps to inspire Americans to get back to work after Labor Day, the latest Atlantic reports on the “office of the future” in a piece called “Thinking Outside the Cube.”

Olga Khazan writes that offices of the future will look familiar – desks and chairs and coffeemakers – but things will be different. Furniture, for one thing, will be much smarter: “A desk could expand to become a conference table, and walls could descend from the ceiling to create a meeting space.”

Or “the company’s espresso machine might, for example, be programmed to find the two teams that need to collaborate on a project and roll itself into position so that those workers will get up and spitball ideas over cappuccinos.” 

A little timeline (“A Brief Chronicle of Offices”) notes that in the early 1800s “[t]he word countinghouse begins to be replaced by the word office.”

It’s a transition captured in an 1855 reference from the historian Macaulay, quoted in the Oxford English Dictionary: “There were those who still remembered him an apprentice, sweeping one of the counting houses of the City.”

By the mid-19th century, countinghouse looked backward: “He” was presumably “remembered” from years – decades? – before.

Oxford’s first set of definitions for office refers to worship and liturgy: “Divine Office.” Then comes “a position or post to which certain duties are attached, esp. one of a more or less public character.” Then come definitions having to do with the duties of “office.” Then more broadly, and generously, “A service or kindness done, or attention shown or given, towards anyone.” This is the sense in the expression “through (someone’s) good offices.” 

The “professional workspace” sense appears only at Definition 6. But The Atlantic notwithstanding, that sense does go far back into the language. Oxford’s earliest example is from Chaucer, no less, “The Friar’s Tale,” circa 1400. Someone says of a woman, “I wol somne hir vn to our office,” or in modern English, “summon her to our office.” 

The King James Bible (1611) is full of “offices” – mostly priestly, to be sure, but here’s an example (II Chronicles 24:11) of the “workspace” sense: “[T]he chest was brought unto the king’s office ... and when they saw that there was much money, the king’s scribe and the high priest’s officer came and emptied the chest....”

This sounds pretty modern, especially the part about emptying out all the cash.

Oxford also cites a Colonial Boston newspaper’s report (1711) of stolen property and the reward offered if “any Person or Persons in whose Custody the aforesaid things ... are, will return them ... to the said Edward Weaver, at his Office....”

However far back the workspace sense goes, though, before office was a place, it was a service, a role, a function, or an action. Form follows function, even as walls drop from the ceiling.

I’ll leave you with that. My espresso machine wants to set up a meeting for me.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Office of the future, offices of the past
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Verbal-Energy/2015/0903/Office-of-the-future-offices-of-the-past
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe