Is the paragraph an endangered species?

As humanity’s global attention span seems to shrink relentlessly, what does this mean for this essential unit of prose?

|
Rogelio V. Solis/AP
A customer looks at the screen size on the new iPhone 6 Plus while waiting in line to upgrade his iPhone at a Verizon Wireless store in Flowood, Miss.

From England comes word of the paragraph under pressure:

“If the statistics are to be believed, by the end of this sentence, I’ll have lost most of you,” Andy Bodle wrote recently in The Guardian’s “Mind Your Language” column. “Because according to some estimates, the average time spent on a webpage is 15 seconds.”

He presents evidence of shrinking attention spans – such as an Associated Press edict limiting news stories to 500 words and a British government promise never to run a sentence longer than 25 words on its website.

“The most obvious casualty of this economy drive is the venerable paragraph,” he concludes.

I’m not sure I agree.

In school I learned that there were four different types of paragraphs, by which were meant essentially brief essays. I can’t recall the types I learned, but today, the paragraph taxonomists are all over the Web. One school promotes a four-type classification (descriptive, narrative, expository, and persuasive). Another promotes seven types, adding process, compare and contrast, and other variations on the theme. (This isn’t quite like the periodic table, or a list of the known hummingbird species.)

Not long after high school, though, I was plunged into newspaperland, where paragraphs were shorter and – amazing! – often lacked topic sentences. 

Paragraph breaks were made to fit text onto the page and help the reader make sense of it.

A defining moment for me came a few years later when I was an editor in the Monitor’s international news department. The Atex system we used in those days had a function called “define sentence.” It was comparable to the “select” feature one uses today for text to be cut and pasted from one location to another. On the Atex screen, though, defined text would blink like some kind of holiday lighting display. It would have looked alarming had the screen been any other color than the calming green it was.

One day I noticed that a sentence in the story I was editing seemed a tad long. Where indeed does it end? I wondered. I hit the “define sentence” button on my terminal and found my entire screen ablink.

I ended up breaking that sentence up into four separate paragraphs.

Paragraphs, in newspaperland, can be “closed up” – combined with a neighbor to save a line in the column. Or they can be “broken” to fill out space.

Insofar as “paragraphs” are understood to be mini-essays – something students, job applicants, and others must show they can write to prove they can use English as a thinking tool – they are alive and well, just maybe not on news websites.

And insofar as paragraphs, or perhaps better, paragraph breaks, are a tool for presenting text, whether on the page of a book, on the screen of a phone, or in the columns of a newspaper, they are one of many tools for communicating meaning – even to multitaskers with a 15-second attention span.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Is the paragraph an endangered species?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Verbal-Energy/2015/0611/Is-the-paragraph-an-endangered-species
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe