Subscribe
Verbal Energy

Things we may know that aren’t so

There’s a way to claim something as a ‘fact’ when it’s not, and linguists have a word for it.

  • close
    While chopping mushrooms in her kitchen, our columnist heard a radio news story about a trend she had never noticed before.
    Walt Hubris
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

Have you noticed that sometimes articles in the news media invite your attention to a trend that you in fact haven’t noticed? 

And that even when informed about it, you have trouble believing the alleged trend is an actual trend, or even any kind of perceptible phenomenon at all, except perhaps in the mind of the author or talking head who is promoting it?

Me, too. 

“Hmm,” I mused the other day as I was in the kitchen, with one ear cocked to the radio, “this one was probably taped before the holidays, so they’d have it in the can for the lull around New Year’s.” And with that I refocused on the mushrooms I was chopping. 

Some recent reading, though, has given me some new terminology for considering what’s going on in a case like this.

The concept here is known as an embedded presupposition. One of the best-known examples, often used in coaching politicians to work with the news media, is “When did you stop beating your wife?”

And you’ve probably noticed that I embedded a presupposition in my first sentence. I framed it as a question: “Have you noticed...?” But I’ve introduced as fact an idea that isn’t necessarily your idea: “Sometimes articles in the news media invite your attention to a trend that you in fact haven’t noticed.”

I’ve used noticed as what linguists call a “factive verb.” Factive is an old-fashioned adjective – even Noah Webster, in 1828, noted it was “not used.” It meant “making,” or “having the power to make,” presumably in a Captain Picard “Make it so” sense.

But the adjective lives on in the field of linguistics. Here’s the Oxford Dictionaries definition of the word in this sense: “Denoting a verb that assigns the status of an established fact to its object (normally a clausal object), e.g., know, regret, resent.” 

You can plant a suggestion with just a phrase: “Have you noticed a trend toward...?” But a complete clause does a better job. A clausal object is typically a “that” clause: I know that you have the background for this position. I regret that you won’t be joining us. She resents that he passed her over for promotion. All these subordinate clauses are just constructs of substantives and verbs. But what factives do, as the dictionary explains, is to assign them “the status of an established fact.”

But not necessarily so. In fact, “you” may not “have the background” for the position, “you” may be joining “us” after all, and “he” may have passed “her” over for promotion only in the sense of giving one job to someone else because “he” knows that something even better suited to “her” talents is about to become available.

As the old saw has it, it’s not what people don’t know that gets them into trouble; it’s what they do know that ain’t so.

And so careful readers and listeners need to be alert to how discourse can be manipulated – if only by journalists seeking a “trend” on a slow news day.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK